| | Back to the Future and Mrs. Doubtfire are also on this, I am going to remove them both because they are very successful films and have become classics, and definitely do not belong on a list of movies considered the worst.--[[User:GrantN|GrantN]] ([[User talk:GrantN|talk]]) 14:36, 29 April 2017 (EDT) | | Back to the Future and Mrs. Doubtfire are also on this, I am going to remove them both because they are very successful films and have become classics, and definitely do not belong on a list of movies considered the worst.--[[User:GrantN|GrantN]] ([[User talk:GrantN|talk]]) 14:36, 29 April 2017 (EDT) |
| | + | Japanese films don't count as Hollywood. And that's not the only problem. For example, the main antagonist of the listed Pokémon film is a supernatural human with goals and motivations not directly driven by capitalism, and Karl (not for "Marx") is not necessarily a leftist. This latter is only PARTIALLY based on Moore, for his appearance (hat, hair, t-shirt). There aren't many leftists or SJWs in Japan, they're traditionally capitalist and conservative. Just because we see something they make as leftist by our point of view, doesn't mean it is to them from their point of view. They are typically neutral and focused on good storytelling and for their own. Pocahontas was removed as a mistake, sorry, for what that concerns the other films, though having valid points to be considered liberal driven in certain aspects others are instead conservative (like Belle's relationship with her father), and others simply debatable (these movies are also hated by leftists themselves and defended by conservatives), however, they don't justify the whole movies to be included in this list because generally speaking they are objectively good movies, and this is a list of the WORST liberal movies. We can't include any film, even good, for having liberal traits, this list is for the WORST movies, WHOLE worst movies. [[User:Republiproud|Republiproud]] ([[User talk:Republiproud|talk]]) 01:08, October 26, 2022 (EDT) |