Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 63: Line 63:  
== 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding for the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms ==
 
== 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding for the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms ==
   −
See also: [[Essay: 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms|10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms]]
+
See also: [[Essay: 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine|10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine]]
    
I wish the funding for the war in Ukraine by American taxpayers would end immediately. Why?
 
I wish the funding for the war in Ukraine by American taxpayers would end immediately. Why?
Line 85: Line 85:  
7. Ukraine is not of vital strategic importance to the USA. The USA has two huge oceans and the Canadians or Mexicans are not going to war with the USA. Europe has twice the population of the USA. Let the Europeans handle this issue which is in their backyard. Let them fund the Ukrainians and their war.
 
7. Ukraine is not of vital strategic importance to the USA. The USA has two huge oceans and the Canadians or Mexicans are not going to war with the USA. Europe has twice the population of the USA. Let the Europeans handle this issue which is in their backyard. Let them fund the Ukrainians and their war.
   −
8. Russia will likely win if the war in Ukraine turns into a war of attrition. See: [[Essay: 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms|10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:36, October 1, 2022 (EDT)
+
8. Russia will likely win if the war in Ukraine turns into a war of attrition. See: [[Essay: 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine|10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:36, October 1, 2022 (EDT)
 
:Good points. The continued many-billion-dollar funding by the [[GOP]] makes no sense.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:59, October 1, 2022 (EDT)
 
:Good points. The continued many-billion-dollar funding by the [[GOP]] makes no sense.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:59, October 1, 2022 (EDT)
   Line 279: Line 279:  
::::This is how the US fights wars - with bribery and inflation. When Saddam Hussein was captured in a hole, he had $600 million dollars in one hundred dollar bills.  Poor Saddam, like Europeans today, you can't eat dollar bills, and all they are good for is throwing them on the fire to keep warm. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 04:54, October 4, 2022 (EDT)
 
::::This is how the US fights wars - with bribery and inflation. When Saddam Hussein was captured in a hole, he had $600 million dollars in one hundred dollar bills.  Poor Saddam, like Europeans today, you can't eat dollar bills, and all they are good for is throwing them on the fire to keep warm. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 04:54, October 4, 2022 (EDT)
   −
:Actually, I posted some British general predicting Russian defeats in the future on main page right. Anyways, since neither side is wanting to go to the peace table soon, I hope the militarily weaker side buckles soon and that appears to be the Russians at the present time. But since wars are unpredictable, I will merely say that the Russians appear to be the underdog. But if a majority of the [[GOP]] decided to pull funding for the Ukrainians that would be good, but I doubt that this will happen (see: [[Essay: 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms|10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine immediately if they win control of the U.S Congress in the 2022 midterms]]). I am not a fan of Russia or Ukraine as they are both corrupt countries with a history of problems related to authoritarianism.  
+
:Actually, I posted some British general predicting Russian defeats in the future on main page right. Anyways, since neither side is wanting to go to the peace table soon, I hope the militarily weaker side buckles soon and that appears to be the Russians at the present time. But since wars are unpredictable, I will merely say that the Russians appear to be the underdog. But if a majority of the [[GOP]] decided to pull funding for the Ukrainians that would be good, but I doubt that this will happen (see: [[Essay: 10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine|10 reasons the Republicans should end funding the war in Ukraine]]). I am not a fan of Russia or Ukraine as they are both corrupt countries with a history of problems related to authoritarianism.  
 
::Predicting is not news. It's the stuff of gypsy fortunetellers and investment advisors.  In today's world, a "national security analyst" "predicting" is called "shaping the narrative", or more specifically "shaping the [[propaganda]] narrative". You'd think you would have learned this by now after Obama CIA chief [[John Brennan]] called Trump a "traitor" for meeting with Putin, or 50 "national security experts" calling the [[Laptop from Hell]] "Russian disinformation." But no, you keep swallowing NATO war propaganda hook, line, and sinker. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 17:11, October 3, 2022 (EDT)
 
::Predicting is not news. It's the stuff of gypsy fortunetellers and investment advisors.  In today's world, a "national security analyst" "predicting" is called "shaping the narrative", or more specifically "shaping the [[propaganda]] narrative". You'd think you would have learned this by now after Obama CIA chief [[John Brennan]] called Trump a "traitor" for meeting with Putin, or 50 "national security experts" calling the [[Laptop from Hell]] "Russian disinformation." But no, you keep swallowing NATO war propaganda hook, line, and sinker. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 17:11, October 3, 2022 (EDT)
 
::War is not a soccer match with fans and cheerleaders. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 00:08, October 6, 2022 (EDT)
 
::War is not a soccer match with fans and cheerleaders. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 00:08, October 6, 2022 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,718

edits

Navigation menu