| Line 15: |
Line 15: |
| | *''[[Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chem. Group]]'', 355 F.3d 345 (5th Cir. 2003) (the test for when private conduct can be considered state action) | | *''[[Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chem. Group]]'', 355 F.3d 345 (5th Cir. 2003) (the test for when private conduct can be considered state action) |
| | *''Story v. Best Way Transp.'', 2020 WL 5045658 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2020) (dismissing a constitutional cause of action because the “named defendants are private actors” and the plaintiff “did not allege that they are state actors or are affiliated with the state”) | | *''Story v. Best Way Transp.'', 2020 WL 5045658 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2020) (dismissing a constitutional cause of action because the “named defendants are private actors” and the plaintiff “did not allege that they are state actors or are affiliated with the state”) |
| | + | *Jallali v. Nat’l Bd. of Osteopathic Med. Examiners, Inc., 2012 WL 3151553 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2012) (defendant not a state actor) |
| | + | *Sanjuan v. Am. Bd. of Psychiatry & Neurology, 40 F.3d 247 (7th Cir. 1994) (defendant not a state actor) |
| | + | *Mattei v. Int’l Conf. of Funeral Serv. Examining Bds., 2015 WL 5125799 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 1, 2015) (defendant not a state actor) |
| | + | *Sammons v. Nat’l Comm’n on Certification of Physician Assistants, Inc., 104 F. Supp. 2d 1379 (N.D. Ga. 2000) (defendant not a state actor) |
| | | | |
| | == Antitrust == | | == Antitrust == |
| Line 43: |
Line 47: |
| | *Goussis v. Kimball, 813 F. Supp. 352 (E.D. Pa. 1993) | | *Goussis v. Kimball, 813 F. Supp. 352 (E.D. Pa. 1993) |
| | *Greater Hous. Transp. Co. v. Uber Techs., Inc., 2015 WL 1034254 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2015) | | *Greater Hous. Transp. Co. v. Uber Techs., Inc., 2015 WL 1034254 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2015) |
| − | *Jallali v. Nat’l Bd. of Osteopathic Med. Examiners, Inc., 2012 WL 3151553 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2012)
| |
| | *John Paul Mitchell Sys. v. Randalls Food Mkts., 17 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2000) | | *John Paul Mitchell Sys. v. Randalls Food Mkts., 17 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2000) |
| | *''Johnson v. Comm’n on Presidential Debates'', 869 F.3d 976 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (antitrust laws are economic, and do not reach marketplace of ideas) | | *''Johnson v. Comm’n on Presidential Debates'', 869 F.3d 976 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (antitrust laws are economic, and do not reach marketplace of ideas) |
| Line 49: |
Line 52: |
| | *Kenney v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 412 F. Supp. 3d 530 (E.D. Pa. 2019) | | *Kenney v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 412 F. Supp. 3d 530 (E.D. Pa. 2019) |
| | *La. Div. Sons of Confederate Veterans v. City of Natchitoches, 370 F. Supp. 3d 692 (W.D. La. 2019) | | *La. Div. Sons of Confederate Veterans v. City of Natchitoches, 370 F. Supp. 3d 692 (W.D. La. 2019) |
| − | *Mattei v. Int’l Conf. of Funeral Serv. Examining Bds., 2015 WL 5125799 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 1, 2015)
| |
| | *McCormack v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Assoc., 845 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1988) | | *McCormack v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Assoc., 845 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1988) |
| | *McMahon v. Fenves, 946 F.3d 266 (5th Cir. 2020) (denying [[standing]] to assert [[First Amendment]] infringement on others, and denying objection to a university's relocation of monuments of the [[Confederacy]]) | | *McMahon v. Fenves, 946 F.3d 266 (5th Cir. 2020) (denying [[standing]] to assert [[First Amendment]] infringement on others, and denying objection to a university's relocation of monuments of the [[Confederacy]]) |
| Line 65: |
Line 67: |
| | *Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997) | | *Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997) |
| | *''Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.'', 442 U.S. 330 (1979) (declaring that "consumer welfare" is the purpose of [[antitrust]] laws, citing [[Robert Bork]]'s treatise) | | *''Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.'', 442 U.S. 330 (1979) (declaring that "consumer welfare" is the purpose of [[antitrust]] laws, citing [[Robert Bork]]'s treatise) |
| − | *Sammons v. Nat’l Comm’n on Certification of Physician Assistants, Inc., 104 F. Supp. 2d 1379 (N.D. Ga. 2000)
| |
| − | *Sanjuan v. Am. Bd. of Psychiatry & Neurology, 40 F.3d 247 (7th Cir. 1994)
| |
| | *Southland Sec. Corp. v. INSpire Ins. Sols. Inc., 365 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2004) | | *Southland Sec. Corp. v. INSpire Ins. Sols. Inc., 365 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2004) |
| | *Spectrum Sports v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993) | | *Spectrum Sports v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993) |