Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
136 bytes added ,  04:32, November 1, 2022
no edit summary
Line 50: Line 50:  
*Walker Process Equip. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965) (Section 2 antitrust violation by allegedly obtaining a patent by fraud)
 
*Walker Process Equip. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965) (Section 2 antitrust violation by allegedly obtaining a patent by fraud)
 
*''Stearns Airport Equip. v. FMC'', 170 F.3d 518, 522 (5th Cir. 1999) ("Exclusionary conduct under section 2 [of the Sherman Act] is the creation or maintenance of monopoly by means other than the competition on the merits embodied in the ''Grinnell'' standard.")
 
*''Stearns Airport Equip. v. FMC'', 170 F.3d 518, 522 (5th Cir. 1999) ("Exclusionary conduct under section 2 [of the Sherman Act] is the creation or maintenance of monopoly by means other than the competition on the merits embodied in the ''Grinnell'' standard.")
 +
*PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc., 615 F.3d 412 (5th Cir. 2010) (antitrust claim depends definition of a realistic relevant market)
 +
*Surgical Care Ctr. of Hammond, L.C. v. Hosp. Serv., 309 F.3d 836 (5th Cir. 2002)  (antitrust claim depends definition of a realistic relevant market)
    
== General procedure ==
 
== General procedure ==
Line 72: Line 74:  
*Pikaluk v. Horseshoe Entm’t L.P., 810 F. App’x 243 (5th Cir. 2020)  
 
*Pikaluk v. Horseshoe Entm’t L.P., 810 F. App’x 243 (5th Cir. 2020)  
 
*Priester v. Lowndes County, 354 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2004)  
 
*Priester v. Lowndes County, 354 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2004)  
−
*PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc., 615 F.3d 412 (5th Cir. 2010)
   
*R2 Invs. LDC v. Phillips, 401 F.3d 638 (5th Cir. 2005)  
 
*R2 Invs. LDC v. Phillips, 401 F.3d 638 (5th Cir. 2005)  
 
*Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997)  
 
*Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997)  
 
*Spectrum Sports v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993)  
 
*Spectrum Sports v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993)  
 
*Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S.A. Glass, Inc., 940 F. Supp. 1026 (E.D. Tex. 1996)  
 
*Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S.A. Glass, Inc., 940 F. Supp. 1026 (E.D. Tex. 1996)  
−
*Suarez v. iHeartMedia + Entm’t, Inc., (W.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2019)  
+
*Suarez v. iHeartMedia + Entm’t, Inc., (W.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2019)
−
*Surgical Care Ctr. of Hammond, L.C. v. Hosp. Serv., 309 F.3d 836 (5th Cir. 2002)
   
*Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. Green, 921 S.W.2d 203 (Tex. 1996)  
 
*Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. Green, 921 S.W.2d 203 (Tex. 1996)  
 
*Transource Int’l, Inc. v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 725 F.2d 274 (5th Cir. 1984)  
 
*Transource Int’l, Inc. v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 725 F.2d 274 (5th Cir. 1984)  
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Navigation menu