| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words. The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm</ref> many good words have developed since. | | Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words. The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm</ref> many good words have developed since. |
| | | | |
| − | Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century. For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,<ref>The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.</ref> there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of "1-2-4-8". This indicates the future will be increasingly conservative. | + | Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century. For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,<ref>The King James Version of the [[Bible]] was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.</ref> there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of "1-2-4-8". This indicates the future will be increasingly conservative. |
| | | | |
| | {| class="wikitable sortable" | | {| class="wikitable sortable" |
| Line 1,638: |
Line 1,638: |
| | |the primary support, typically for something good | | |the primary support, typically for something good |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |mainstay | + | |make-work |
| − | |1787 | + | |1923 |
| − | |the primary support, typically for something good | + | |inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals. [[Jesus]] criticized make-work at {{bibleref|Luke|10|41-42}} |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |mama's boy | | |mama's boy |
| Line 1,653: |
Line 1,653: |
| | |1970s<ref>This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].</ref> | | |1970s<ref>This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].</ref> |
| | |William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, "Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946. The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?"<ref>Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.</ref> | | |William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, "Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946. The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?"<ref>Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.</ref> |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |make-work
| |
| − | |1923
| |
| − | |inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals. [[Jesus]] criticized make-work at {{bibleref|Luke|10|41-42}}
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |[[market failure]] | | |[[market failure]] |