Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sports gambling (view source)

Revision as of 05:35, November 13, 2022

409 bytes added ,  05:35, November 13, 2022
California Propositions 26 and 27 both lost big
Line 4: Line 4:     
Sports gambling is considered a big "winner" due to the [[COVID-19]] pandemic and a combination of state laws and a [[First Circuit]] federal appellate decision which opened the floodgates to it.  The result is more hardship on families that can least afford it.
 
Sports gambling is considered a big "winner" due to the [[COVID-19]] pandemic and a combination of state laws and a [[First Circuit]] federal appellate decision which opened the floodgates to it.  The result is more hardship on families that can least afford it.
 +
== California referenda 2022 ==
 +
Two sports gambling initiatives in 2022 in California lost big.
 +
 +
Proposition 26 was to allow in-person sports gambling at Indian tribe casinos and four private horse racetracks. It lost 70%-30%.<ref>https://calmatters.org/politics/election-2022/2022/11/california-sports-betting-what-next/</ref>
 +
 +
Proposition 27 would have permitted online sports betting, and it lost 83%-17%.
 
== Worst states ==
 
== Worst states ==
 
The worst states -- i.e., those having the most sports gambling -- the following starting with the largest volume of betting on sports:
 
The worst states -- i.e., those having the most sports gambling -- the following starting with the largest volume of betting on sports:
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1900707"

Navigation menu