1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 232:
Line 232: − − I find it funny that Conservapedia advertises themselves as unbiased and trustworthy, yet include all sorts of biased opinions such as "Jesus is the son of God." As "unbiased" as you may think that is, it is an unproven opinion that you are portraying as a fact. Good luck getting credibility from anyone other than right-wing Christians. Oh wait, they're the only ones that matter anyways, right?
Undo revision 190904 by Special:Contributions/Nickapleeze (User talk:Nickapleeze)
:::The Bible may be held by some to be holy, but that view isn't held by all (indeed, it's only held by a minority of the world's population). Other holy texts do not claim that Jesus was the son of God. Conservapedia should not be in the business of stating that one holy text is true and others are false, because this is a matter of faith, not fact. [[User:JohnSmith|JohnSmith]] 16:27, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
:::The Bible may be held by some to be holy, but that view isn't held by all (indeed, it's only held by a minority of the world's population). Other holy texts do not claim that Jesus was the son of God. Conservapedia should not be in the business of stating that one holy text is true and others are false, because this is a matter of faith, not fact. [[User:JohnSmith|JohnSmith]] 16:27, 22 May 2007 (EDT)