Changes

And secondly, in what state, or in what federal law, are law enforcement agencies mandated to keep statistics of domestic abuse in homosexual relationships?  If we are to contemplate things such as so-called "gay marriage", then what may be appropriate is to investigate the level of domestic abuse in homosexual relationships.  And I believe, it may be credibily proven, homosexual relationships suffer from a distinctly higher proportion of violence than heterosexual relationships -- and the law may as of now, not take any consideration of this in compiling statisitcs for us to make a judgemental value.

And secondly, in what state, or in what federal law, are law enforcement agencies mandated to keep statistics of domestic abuse in homosexual relationships?  If we are to contemplate things such as so-called "gay marriage", then what may be appropriate is to investigate the level of domestic abuse in homosexual relationships.  And I believe, it may be credibily proven, homosexual relationships suffer from a distinctly higher proportion of violence than heterosexual relationships -- and the law may as of now, not take any consideration of this in compiling statisitcs for us to make a judgemental value.

Thirdly, ''"it does not seem that the FBI '''intends''' for this kind of crime to be reported"''.  It makes no difference what the FBI's "intent" is, the FBI is mandated by law to keep track of protected groups in hate crime reporting.  Therein lies the problem, the legasl mandate dictates a statistical and biased error in reporting, which likely is intended to lead the public to a faulty conclusion, i.e. that anti-homosexual violence is solely the responsibility of heterosexuals.  Given what I've stated above, if heterosexuals are to be responsibile to insure against anti-homosexual violence, and if a disproportionate degree of reported "hate crimes" are perpetrated by homosexual offenders upon homosexuals, then the heterosexual community deserves accurate reporting on such, '''''before''''' heterosexuals are asked to pass judgement upon recognizing the legal validity of domestic, homosexual partnerships.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:34, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

Thirdly, ''"it does not seem that the FBI '''intends''' for this kind of crime to be reported"''.  It makes no difference what the FBI's "intent" is, the FBI is mandated by law to keep track of protected groups in hate crime reporting.  Therein lies the problem, this legal mandate dictates a statistical and biased error in reporting, which likely is intended to lead the public to a faulty conclusion, i.e. that anti-homosexual violence is solely the responsibility of heterosexuals.  Given what I've stated above, if heterosexuals are to be responsibile to insure against anti-homosexual violence, and if a disproportionate degree of reported "hate crimes" are perpetrated by homosexual offenders upon homosexuals, then the heterosexual community deserves accurate reporting on such, '''''before''''' heterosexuals are asked to pass judgement upon recognizing the legal validity of domestic, homosexual partnerships.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:34, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

== References for Anti-homosexual violence discussion ==

== References for Anti-homosexual violence discussion ==