Changes

:Hitler viewed it basically as a propoaganda campaign.  He wrote a whole chapter on propaganda in ''Mien Kampf'', marvelling and admiring how effective British propaganda, without bullets, was in WWI.  This was given high priority in Nazi Germany, Goebbels Ministry was built on, and modeled after British propaganda (state run BBC).  Hitler could never understand why Britain didn't make common-cause with Germany against the USSR, always couldn't understand what they expected to gain.  Many Brits as well, never thought the War was worth the effort expended, during it and after.  And Britain had absolutely nothing to gain, and everything to loose.  In fact, while being a victor, they lost everything, i.e. the British Empire.

:Hitler viewed it basically as a propoaganda campaign.  He wrote a whole chapter on propaganda in ''Mien Kampf'', marvelling and admiring how effective British propaganda, without bullets, was in WWI.  This was given high priority in Nazi Germany, Goebbels Ministry was built on, and modeled after British propaganda (state run BBC).  Hitler could never understand why Britain didn't make common-cause with Germany against the USSR, always couldn't understand what they expected to gain.  Many Brits as well, never thought the War was worth the effort expended, during it and after.  And Britain had absolutely nothing to gain, and everything to loose.  In fact, while being a victor, they lost everything, i.e. the British Empire.

:This brings us to a discusssion of the [[Arsenal of Democracy]], and Churchill's "give us the tools, and we'll finish the job" speech.  In 1940, the US was adament about remaining neutral.  The Arsenal of Democracy, for US domestic consumption, meant the US would get invovled in building weapons, but not supply manpower, i.e. bloodshed.  This was extremely controversial at the time.  Churchill's speech was intended as a reassurance, if the US would amend the Neutrality Act, and allow Lend Lease shipments, Britain had the manpower (which survived Dunkirk), but only needed the tools (weapons) from American factories (the Arsenal of Democracy).  This was the propaganda sold to the American public, that the US could take sides, arm Britain, yet not expend any manpower or bloodshed of its own.  Hitler evidently believed it aas well, never thinking American troops would assemble in Great Britain to invade someday.  Or if it did happen, it would take years and years to build the ships, ship the material and manpower, and finally mount an invasion.

:This brings us to a discusssion of the [[Arsenal of Democracy]], and Churchill's "give us the tools, and we'll finish the job" speech.  In 1940, the US was adament about remaining neutral.  The Arsenal of Democracy, for US domestic consumption, meant the US would get invovled in building weapons, but not supply manpower, i.e. bloodshed.  This was extremely controversial at the time.  Churchill's speech was intended as a reassurance, if the US would amend the Neutrality Act, and allow Lend Lease shipments, Britain had the manpower (which survived Dunkirk), but only needed the tools (weapons) from American factories (the Arsenal of Democracy).  This was the propaganda sold to the American public, that the US could take sides, arm Britain, yet not expend any manpower or bloodshed of its own.  Hitler evidently believed it as well, never thinking American troops would assemble in Great Britain to invade someday.  Or if it did happen, it would take years and years to build the ships, ship the material and manpower, and finally mount an invasion.

:That is why, in 1940, Hitler let the British Expediationary Force slip away at Dunkirk.  To him, it was only a "brisk, jolly little war", like a game of touch football where nobody gets hurt.  And Total War against Britain was not in his mind.  Total War against the USSR was, but he would have liked to have Britain as an ally in such a venture. And whether or not Britain was an ally, didn't disrupt his plans.  And truth be told, Hitler always admired and respected Great Britain, but could not figure out why they would destroy themselves and their Empire to gain nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:09, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

:That is why, in 1940, Hitler let the British Expediationary Force slip away at Dunkirk.  To him, it was only a "brisk, jolly little war", like a game of touch football where nobody gets hurt.  And Total War against Britain was not in his mind.  Total War against the USSR was, but he would have liked to have Britain as an ally in such a venture. And whether or not Britain was an ally, didn't disrupt his plans.  And truth be told, Hitler always admired and respected Great Britain, but could not figure out why they would destroy themselves and their Empire to gain nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:09, 6 June 2007 (EDT)