Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Supreme Court: new section
Line 192: Line 192:  
:(edit conflict) Appreciate your candor.  Please tell us what you really think!  That's what makes this debate fun and enlightening.  I don't pretend to have the answer, and we still have a few days.
 
:(edit conflict) Appreciate your candor.  Please tell us what you really think!  That's what makes this debate fun and enlightening.  I don't pretend to have the answer, and we still have a few days.
 
:As feedback, I think the Supreme Court Justices are not populist enough in a populist year.  Also, many of their rulings in favor of the [[Deep State]] and even deferring to the Fulton County prosecutor(!!) were harmful.  Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] deserves more credit than he gets, and he hit all the right notes all year long.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:29, December 22, 2022 (EST)
 
:As feedback, I think the Supreme Court Justices are not populist enough in a populist year.  Also, many of their rulings in favor of the [[Deep State]] and even deferring to the Fulton County prosecutor(!!) were harmful.  Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] deserves more credit than he gets, and he hit all the right notes all year long.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:29, December 22, 2022 (EST)
 +
 +
== Supreme Court  ==
 +
 +
I think that the 5 Supreme Court Justice who voted to strike down Roe v. Wade should be Conservative of the Year, rather than just Justice Alito, as Justice Alito alone could not have overturned Roe v. Wade. Also, the Supreme Court had other conservative victories such as on religious liberty and gun rights where the 5 justices sided with the conservative position.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:36, December 22, 2022 (EST)
SkipCaptcha
194

edits

Navigation menu