Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎My input: whoops, probably should specify in the section header
Line 180: Line 180:  
:*Kyrsten Sinema- No. She's not going at the DNC hard like Tulsi Gabbard did when she left the party earlier this year. In fact, I would replace Sinema with Gabbard on this list.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 00:27, December 22, 2022 (EST)
 
:*Kyrsten Sinema- No. She's not going at the DNC hard like Tulsi Gabbard did when she left the party earlier this year. In fact, I would replace Sinema with Gabbard on this list.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 00:27, December 22, 2022 (EST)
   −
== My input ==
+
== LT's input ==
    
Ron Johnson? Sure, since his blunt style and streak of victory over the left leaves a good legacy for the conservative movement to emulate? "D.C. prisoners"? A hard no, because a) it's not even properly clarified specifically who (all of them, or some?), b) some probably are the violent criminals rather than peaceful protesters, and c) it's not a good example to hastily martyr loosely defined collectives simply because they are victims of one specific oppressor without analyzing the details of the individuals.
 
Ron Johnson? Sure, since his blunt style and streak of victory over the left leaves a good legacy for the conservative movement to emulate? "D.C. prisoners"? A hard no, because a) it's not even properly clarified specifically who (all of them, or some?), b) some probably are the violent criminals rather than peaceful protesters, and c) it's not a good example to hastily martyr loosely defined collectives simply because they are victims of one specific oppressor without analyzing the details of the individuals.
SkipCaptcha
35,519

edits

Navigation menu