| Line 193: |
Line 193: |
| | :As feedback, I think the Supreme Court Justices are not populist enough in a populist year. Also, many of their rulings in favor of the [[Deep State]] and even deferring to the Fulton County prosecutor(!!) were harmful. Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] deserves more credit than he gets, and he hit all the right notes all year long.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:29, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | :As feedback, I think the Supreme Court Justices are not populist enough in a populist year. Also, many of their rulings in favor of the [[Deep State]] and even deferring to the Fulton County prosecutor(!!) were harmful. Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] deserves more credit than he gets, and he hit all the right notes all year long.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:29, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | + | ===D'Souza, Abbott, 1/6 protesters=== |
| | ::[EC] [EC] Whew, I'm very glad to hear that you're open to hearing my full honest thoughts, since you and I may have some strong differences in approaching the best way of advancing conservative values, especially whether populist appeals are compatible with conservatism itself (though ultimately, can strongly concur on the importance of preserving and advancing authentic conservative virtues). I still got a bit more to add on... | | ::[EC] [EC] Whew, I'm very glad to hear that you're open to hearing my full honest thoughts, since you and I may have some strong differences in approaching the best way of advancing conservative values, especially whether populist appeals are compatible with conservatism itself (though ultimately, can strongly concur on the importance of preserving and advancing authentic conservative virtues). I still got a bit more to add on... |
| | ::Meloni is unfortunately entangled with controversies over neofascism, and given her questionable history and unclear alleged repudiation of past terrible statements (please do correct me if her more recent assertions are contrary to my summary), it's better to take her credentials with a grain of salt for the time being. | | ::Meloni is unfortunately entangled with controversies over neofascism, and given her questionable history and unclear alleged repudiation of past terrible statements (please do correct me if her more recent assertions are contrary to my summary), it's better to take her credentials with a grain of salt for the time being. |
| Line 198: |
Line 199: |
| | :::Comment on DC political prisoners: there has been enough reporting on this to substantiate that virtually all were Capitol tourists, with a few being framed up on bogus charges because of their affiliation with a patriotic veterans group (in fact, there may have been racist motivations behind the prosecution of a black Cuban, [[Proud_Boys|Enrique Tarrio]], who [[Twitter#Racist_administrators|we documented being banned]] by [[Twitter]]/[[FBI]] a few years ago when he was running for Congress.) The few "violent criminals" as alleged, such as the alleged "Qanon Shaman" who really is an environmental activist, have been prosecuted already. The remainder sing the National Anthem nightly and this is an opportunity to remind the world they have not been forgotten. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 17:46, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | :::Comment on DC political prisoners: there has been enough reporting on this to substantiate that virtually all were Capitol tourists, with a few being framed up on bogus charges because of their affiliation with a patriotic veterans group (in fact, there may have been racist motivations behind the prosecution of a black Cuban, [[Proud_Boys|Enrique Tarrio]], who [[Twitter#Racist_administrators|we documented being banned]] by [[Twitter]]/[[FBI]] a few years ago when he was running for Congress.) The few "violent criminals" as alleged, such as the alleged "Qanon Shaman" who really is an environmental activist, have been prosecuted already. The remainder sing the National Anthem nightly and this is an opportunity to remind the world they have not been forgotten. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 17:46, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | :::As to Ron Johnson, he's a Ukronazi symp (Hummers are built in [[Oshkosh]] Wisconsin, which is why he voted for the [[MIC]] boondoggle). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 18:07, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | :::As to Ron Johnson, he's a Ukronazi symp (Hummers are built in [[Oshkosh]] Wisconsin, which is why he voted for the [[MIC]] boondoggle). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 18:07, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | + | :::: |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Trudeau protestors=== |
| | ::The convoy protest crowd? I'm going to say no. I'm personally inclined to contend that, while the majority of it was peaceful and grounded in a reasonable reaction against Trudeau parafascism, there were nonetheless fringe extremists that had too much of a presence in the crowd and I'm not fully sure how much they were fully repudiated on the spot by the majority of presumed everyday, decent people. My larger concern deals with the theme of worldwide populist revolt against government that's turning towards a zealous, and often militant direction, which eerily parallels, if not actually is the manifestation of [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Thessalonians%202&version=ESV what's warned in 2 Thessalonians]: | | ::The convoy protest crowd? I'm going to say no. I'm personally inclined to contend that, while the majority of it was peaceful and grounded in a reasonable reaction against Trudeau parafascism, there were nonetheless fringe extremists that had too much of a presence in the crowd and I'm not fully sure how much they were fully repudiated on the spot by the majority of presumed everyday, decent people. My larger concern deals with the theme of worldwide populist revolt against government that's turning towards a zealous, and often militant direction, which eerily parallels, if not actually is the manifestation of [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Thessalonians%202&version=ESV what's warned in 2 Thessalonians]: |
| | {{cquote|Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things? And you know what is restraining him now so that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way.|||2 Thessalonians 2:1–7}} | | {{cquote|Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things? And you know what is restraining him now so that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way.|||2 Thessalonians 2:1–7}} |
| | ::Related to worldwide populist protests, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlU3gcZPN7Q this biblical analysis by On Point Preparedness] is an absolute must-watch for every Christian concerned with contemporary chaos in relation to end times prophecy. (please pardon me for almost sounding too much like a generic YouTube clickbait ad, though I'm seriously not exaggerating the emphasized importance) —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 15:48, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | ::Related to worldwide populist protests, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlU3gcZPN7Q this biblical analysis by On Point Preparedness] is an absolute must-watch for every Christian concerned with contemporary chaos in relation to end times prophecy. (please pardon me for almost sounding too much like a generic YouTube clickbait ad, though I'm seriously not exaggerating the emphasized importance) —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 15:48, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | + | ===Lake=== |
| | ::Kari Lake? She's following the hardline Trumpist style of stubborn, paramilitant (if not arguably militant), pararevolutionary, and ultrapopulist promulgation of blabbering blatherskite <small>(yes, this term is a reference to a cartoon series)</small>. Maybe she's not nearly as bad-faith and fringe especially in comparison to party compatriots of the same populist stripe (the neo-Marxist left-wing efforts to tie her to "neo-Nazis" seems absolutely pathetic), and I personally don't care to object to her that much, though don't see much merit for her gaining even the runner-up, since she a) lost a race that could've been won on a more pragmatically-focused campaign, and b) almost seems to be following a Stacey Abrams–path of election trutherism, IMO. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:04, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | ::Kari Lake? She's following the hardline Trumpist style of stubborn, paramilitant (if not arguably militant), pararevolutionary, and ultrapopulist promulgation of blabbering blatherskite <small>(yes, this term is a reference to a cartoon series)</small>. Maybe she's not nearly as bad-faith and fringe especially in comparison to party compatriots of the same populist stripe (the neo-Marxist left-wing efforts to tie her to "neo-Nazis" seems absolutely pathetic), and I personally don't care to object to her that much, though don't see much merit for her gaining even the runner-up, since she a) lost a race that could've been won on a more pragmatically-focused campaign, and b) almost seems to be following a Stacey Abrams–path of election trutherism, IMO. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:04, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | :::That's borderline blasphemy, to utter Kari Lake's name in the same sentence as Stacey Abrams. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 18:22, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | :::That's borderline blasphemy, to utter Kari Lake's name in the same sentence as Stacey Abrams. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 18:22, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Youngkin and Zeldin=== |
| | ::Youngkin and Zeldin? Yes! Both are making substantial GOP inroads in blue states that the standard "mainstream Republican" (now the Trumpist type) would not be able to accomplish, and their coattails have helped U.S. House elections this year in securing key GOP flips; there were several GOP pickups in NY, and Youngkin Republican [[Jen Kiggans]] defeated establishment Democrat [[Elaine Luria]] this November in one of the key swing races. Their political style represent the practical future of the Republican Party, IMO. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:14, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | ::Youngkin and Zeldin? Yes! Both are making substantial GOP inroads in blue states that the standard "mainstream Republican" (now the Trumpist type) would not be able to accomplish, and their coattails have helped U.S. House elections this year in securing key GOP flips; there were several GOP pickups in NY, and Youngkin Republican [[Jen Kiggans]] defeated establishment Democrat [[Elaine Luria]] this November in one of the key swing races. Their political style represent the practical future of the Republican Party, IMO. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:14, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | :::Youngkin is a [[WEF]] graduate, as I understand. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 17:46, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | :::Youngkin is a [[WEF]] graduate, as I understand. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 17:46, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Sen. Paul=== |
| | ::Rand Paul... I'm open to him being the runner-up, since he isn't heavily entrenched into the ultrapopulist MAGA wing, and reasonably opposes outrageous spending. Sinema? No, since she's not even a conservative, even if a few bucks from the Administration may be commendable. Mark Robinson? ...no, since he's often times embarrassing and is used by leftists as a strawman for their "right-wingers are bigoted" arguments. The Federalist Society? ...no, as explained below by Andy. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:27, December 22, 2022 (EST) | | ::Rand Paul... I'm open to him being the runner-up, since he isn't heavily entrenched into the ultrapopulist MAGA wing, and reasonably opposes outrageous spending. Sinema? No, since she's not even a conservative, even if a few bucks from the Administration may be commendable. Mark Robinson? ...no, since he's often times embarrassing and is used by leftists as a strawman for their "right-wingers are bigoted" arguments. The Federalist Society? ...no, as explained below by Andy. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Exodus 23:2)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:27, December 22, 2022 (EST) |
| | | | |