SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,404
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 265:
Line 265: +
Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022 (view source)
Revision as of 01:49, December 23, 2022
, 01:49, December 23, 2022Ron Johnson
::In my opinion, his behavior on January 6 disqualifies him for any future consideration for Conservative of the Year. Yes, I get that was nearly two years ago, and we've since forgiven some of the other people who voted to certify the election. But this is a special case. He originally was going to vote ''against'' certifying the election, but changed his mind at the eleventh hour in order to virtue signal. If he's willing to do that, then he's an opportunist and anything he says or does going forward should be automatically suspect. I hope I'm not being too harsh here.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:22, December 22, 2022 (EST)
::In my opinion, his behavior on January 6 disqualifies him for any future consideration for Conservative of the Year. Yes, I get that was nearly two years ago, and we've since forgiven some of the other people who voted to certify the election. But this is a special case. He originally was going to vote ''against'' certifying the election, but changed his mind at the eleventh hour in order to virtue signal. If he's willing to do that, then he's an opportunist and anything he says or does going forward should be automatically suspect. I hope I'm not being too harsh here.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:22, December 22, 2022 (EST)
:::Please explain further, because my understanding is that Johnson's actions and comments relating to Jan. 6th were better than all other Republican Senators, except perhaps Josh Hawley.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:24, December 22, 2022 (EST)
:::Please explain further, because my understanding is that Johnson's actions and comments relating to Jan. 6th were better than all other Republican Senators, except perhaps Josh Hawley.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:24, December 22, 2022 (EST)
:::::Ron Johnson was one of the several Senators who withdrew their planned objections to the election results in response to the storming of the Capitol. Utter cowardice.[https://www.wkow.com/news/politics/sen-ron-johnson-decides-to-not-object-arizona-s-electoral-votes-despite-continued-concerns/article_a5cbe39b-7202-5c36-b1e2-f6ddb8aed1b0.html][https://www.wispolitics.com/2021/johnson-said-he-hoped-objections-to-states-electoral-college-votes-would-dispel-election-myths]--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:49, December 22, 2022 (EST)
::::Ron Johnson, God love him, is probably the most knowledge sitting member of Congress on [[Biden family corruption]]. However, he's recently made comments on the Russian boogeyman [[conspiracy theory]]. I understand why. After leaving all those Hummers in Afghanistan, his home state gets a big contract to build them for Ukraine. It comes down to this: if he votes for $1.7 trillion omnibus bill, he's a sellout to the [[military industrial complex]]; if he votes against it, he's standing on principle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 20:43, December 22, 2022 (EST)
::::Ron Johnson, God love him, is probably the most knowledge sitting member of Congress on [[Biden family corruption]]. However, he's recently made comments on the Russian boogeyman [[conspiracy theory]]. I understand why. After leaving all those Hummers in Afghanistan, his home state gets a big contract to build them for Ukraine. It comes down to this: if he votes for $1.7 trillion omnibus bill, he's a sellout to the [[military industrial complex]]; if he votes against it, he's standing on principle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 20:43, December 22, 2022 (EST)