Changes

:An atheist at a secular leftist wiki recently wrote: "As far as I knew, Dawkins was that one atheist dude Conservapedia gets mad about."  

:An atheist at a secular leftist wiki recently wrote: "As far as I knew, Dawkins was that one atheist dude Conservapedia gets mad about."  

:For the record, I was never mad at Richard Dawkins. But I do like winning and set a goal to help Christendom destroy the [[atheist movement]] which I did (See: [[Decline of the atheist movement]]). I did it through the strategies of [[divide and conquer]] and [[Decapitation (military and political strategy)]]. Conservapedia's [[atheism and women]] article has over 170,000 page views and its [[Richard Dawkins and women]] article about 50,000 page views. Before the [[Elevatorgate]] controversy that involved feminists attacking Dawkins which sunk Dawkins and split/the atheist movement, Conservapedia was cited by the feminist magazine ''Ms. Magazine'' concerning Dawkins' website (See:  [[Monica Shores]]). And Conservapedia's [[Richard Dawkins]] article the articles on Dawkins/atheism related to women racked up a ton of page views. In short, Conservapedia doused atheism with feminist disgruntment before the Elevatorgate controversy and then the feminist [[Rebecca Watson]] who was a central figure in the Elevatorgate controversy lit the match so Dawkins was engulfed in the flames of atheist feminism rage.  It was a glorious victory! But I did feel a bit bad when Dawkins had a stroke related to being disinvited to an atheist event and no doubt the Elevatorgate controversy played a part in that as well as some of his other statements that got a lot of people angry at him. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:09, December 24, 2022 (EST)

:For the record, I was never mad at Richard Dawkins. '''But I do like winning''' and set a goal to help Christendom destroy the [[atheist movement]] which I did (See: [[Decline of the atheist movement]]). I did it through the strategies of [[divide and conquer]] and [[Decapitation (military and political strategy)]]. Conservapedia's [[atheism and women]] article has over 170,000 page views and its [[Richard Dawkins and women]] article about 50,000 page views. Before the [[Elevatorgate]] controversy that involved feminists attacking Dawkins which sunk Dawkins and split/the atheist movement, Conservapedia was cited by the feminist magazine ''Ms. Magazine'' concerning Dawkins' website (See:  [[Monica Shores]]). And Conservapedia's [[Richard Dawkins]] article the articles on Dawkins/atheism related to women racked up a ton of page views. In short, Conservapedia doused atheism with feminist disgruntment before the Elevatorgate controversy and then the feminist [[Rebecca Watson]] who was a central figure in the Elevatorgate controversy lit the match so Dawkins was engulfed in the flames of atheist feminism rage.  It was a glorious victory! But I did feel a bit bad when Dawkins had a stroke related to being disinvited to an atheist event and no doubt the Elevatorgate controversy played a part in that as well as some of his other statements that got a lot of people angry at him. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:09, December 24, 2022 (EST)

=== Postscript on why conservatives got Roe vs. Wade overturned ===

=== Postscript on why conservatives got Roe vs. Wade overturned ===