Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 110:
Line 110: + + + + + + + +
→Re: article edit: reply
I was trying to make an additional edit adding information (including reflinks) and doing some clarification on that part of the article when I ran into an edit conflict due to the edit being reverted on claims of a "good faith" edit by ChenXiansheng (who, based on [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/ChenXiansheng his editing history], has ''never'' made "good faith" edits but always tries to insert liberal POV-skewing edits done with the intent of forcing articles toward an LPOV). Why? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:57, January 7, 2023 (EST)
I was trying to make an additional edit adding information (including reflinks) and doing some clarification on that part of the article when I ran into an edit conflict due to the edit being reverted on claims of a "good faith" edit by ChenXiansheng (who, based on [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/ChenXiansheng his editing history], has ''never'' made "good faith" edits but always tries to insert liberal POV-skewing edits done with the intent of forcing articles toward an LPOV). Why? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:57, January 7, 2023 (EST)
:You're misconstruing the matter. ChenXiansheng is working to ''remove'' POV from articles, and removing excessive rightward POVs does not mean that he's inserting a liberal POV. A number of articles contain unencyclopedic tones particularly in lead sections, which ought to be ridded. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Mark 8:36)</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 23:10, January 7, 2023 (EST)
:You're misconstruing the matter. ChenXiansheng is working to ''remove'' POV from articles, and removing excessive rightward POVs does not mean that he's inserting a liberal POV. A number of articles contain unencyclopedic tones particularly in lead sections, which ought to be ridded. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Mark 8:36)</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 23:10, January 7, 2023 (EST)
::I have to beg to differ here, but ChenXiansheng (as noted above) has never gone out of his way to "remove" what he thinks is POV from articles, but to instead insert LPOV (per these edits, for examples: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Neurodiversity&diff=1920869&oldid=1839695][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Google&diff=prev&oldid=1902511][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Freedom_Convoy&diff=prev&oldid=1839315][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine_passports&diff=prev&oldid=1806030][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=People%27s_Party_of_Canada&diff=1797764&oldid=1797761] [Showing the version of the article in edit 5, as ChenXiansheng originally wrote it] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=One_America_News_Network&diff=prev&oldid=1789947][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Science&diff=prev&oldid=1776127][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_news&diff=prev&oldid=1774705] )
::Also, per my previous edit addendum (before the edit conflict that prevented my insertion of those reflinks), these are the reflinks in question:
::[https://theautismcafe.com/the-dangers-of-the-neurodiversity-movement/ Bullying and the dark side of the Neurodiversity Movement]
::[https://quillette.com/2021/09/03/creeping-neurodiversity-orthodoxy/ The Creeping Orthodoxy of the Neurodiversity Movement]
::[[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:40, January 7, 2023 (EST)