Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 662:
Line 662: − +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 01:08, January 21, 2023
, 01:08, January 21, 2023no edit summary
|Conservapedia points out that "WP [Wikipedia] policy should be bent more toward the historical method rather than journalistic standards."<ref>[[User_talk:Aschlafly/Archive65#Core_principles_for_determining_reliability]].</ref>
|Conservapedia points out that "WP [Wikipedia] policy should be bent more toward the historical method rather than journalistic standards."<ref>[[User_talk:Aschlafly/Archive65#Core_principles_for_determining_reliability]].</ref>
|[[Wikipedia]] is the ultimate font of all human wisdom and knowledge.
|[[Wikipedia]] is the ultimate font of all human wisdom and knowledge.
|[https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/wikipedia-is-a-big-problem-that-nobody-is-talking-about/ Wikipedia is a Big Problem That Nobody is Talking About.] "The content on Wikipedia is nothing but a kind of 'information laundering' lifted from mainstream press editorializing."
|[https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/wikipedia-is-a-big-problem-that-nobody-is-talking-about/ Wikipedia is a Big Problem That Nobody is Talking About.] "The content on Wikipedia is nothing but a kind of 'information laundering' lifted from [[mainstream]] press editorializing."
|January 16, 2023
|January 16, 2023
|-
|-