Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,396
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49:
Line 49: − − === Britain's economic funk will likely endure. The USA will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future === − − *[[Essay: Godless Britain's economic funk will likely endure. The USA will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future|Godless Britain's economic funk will likely endure. The USA will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future]]
no edit summary
''The Economist'' states: "But even if the frontier is slowing, there is no iron law that says Britain cannot move closer to it. Catching up with America’s level of labour productivity would mean that Britain’s gdp per person would be £6,600 higher, for example. And even if it is hard to pin down the exact sources of the productivity slowdown in the 2010s, it is easier to identify areas where Britain has to do better in future. They fall into three big categories: investment, people and the spread of knowledge."<ref>[https://archive.md/LeOoB#selection-871.0-875.302 Britain’s productivity problem is long-standing and getting worse]</ref>
''The Economist'' states: "But even if the frontier is slowing, there is no iron law that says Britain cannot move closer to it. Catching up with America’s level of labour productivity would mean that Britain’s gdp per person would be £6,600 higher, for example. And even if it is hard to pin down the exact sources of the productivity slowdown in the 2010s, it is easier to identify areas where Britain has to do better in future. They fall into three big categories: investment, people and the spread of knowledge."<ref>[https://archive.md/LeOoB#selection-871.0-875.302 Britain’s productivity problem is long-standing and getting worse]</ref>
== British religion and irreligion ==
== British religion and irreligion ==