1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 176:
Line 176: + +
→Both Theories Correct?: Yes, it happens all the time that some viewpoints are superior over others for some purposes.
::I have to agree with QNA. You are pulling the same trick that the evolutionists pull when they capitalize "Theory and Evolution" and then claim that the word ''theory'' has been promoted from a ''hypotesis'' to a ''field of study'', like Number Theory. But geocentrism was never such a field. It was a viewpoint that fell to a superior (for most purposes) viewpoint. Happens all the time in science. [[User:Ga ohoyt|Ga ohoyt]] 20:37, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
::I have to agree with QNA. You are pulling the same trick that the evolutionists pull when they capitalize "Theory and Evolution" and then claim that the word ''theory'' has been promoted from a ''hypotesis'' to a ''field of study'', like Number Theory. But geocentrism was never such a field. It was a viewpoint that fell to a superior (for most purposes) viewpoint. Happens all the time in science. [[User:Ga ohoyt|Ga ohoyt]] 20:37, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
::: Yes, it happens all the time that some viewpoints are superior over others for some purposes. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:04, 7 June 2007 (EDT)