Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,865
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + + + + + + +
→Signs of cognitive discussion in a person engaged in a discussion/argument
*The person is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments
*The person is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments
*The person myopically focuses on one variable/aspect of a matter rather than looking at the whole issue. See also: [[Fallacy of exclusion]]
*The individual engages in "mind reading" and baselessly attributes bad intentions in the other party
*The person becomes angry and/or abusive - even when not provoked. See also: [[Appeal to ridicule]]
*Rather than focus on the matter at hand, the person engages in personal attacks. See also: [[Ad hominem]]
==== Overcoming cognitive dissonance in a person who has shut down rational thinking ====
==Responses to cognitive dissonance==
==Responses to cognitive dissonance==