Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 136: Line 136:  
Below are signs of [[cognitive dissonance]] in an atheist engaged in a discussion/argument:  
 
Below are signs of [[cognitive dissonance]] in an atheist engaged in a discussion/argument:  
   −
*The person is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments
+
*The atheist is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments in favor of [[theism]].
   −
*The individual mischaracterizes the points/position of the other party - often in a dishonest way
+
*The atheist mischaracterizes the points/position of a theist - often in a dishonest way
   −
*The person myopically focuses on one variable/aspect of a matter rather than looking at the whole issue. See also: [[Fallacy of exclusion]]
+
*The atheist myopically focuses on one variable/aspect of a matter rather than looking at the whole issue. See also: [[Fallacy of exclusion]]
   −
*The individual engages in "mind reading" and baselessly attributes bad intentions in the other party  
+
*The atheist engages in "mind reading" and baselessly attributes bad intentions in the other party  
   −
*The person becomes angry - even when not provoked.
+
*The atheist becomes angry - even when not provoked. See also: [[Atheism and anger]]
   −
*Rather than focus on the matter at hand, the person engages in personal attacks. See also: [[Ad hominem]]
+
*Rather than focus on the matter at hand, the person engages in personal attacks and other abusive behavior. See also: [[Ad hominem]] and [[Atheism and mockery]]
    
==== Overcoming cognitive dissonance in an evolutionist who has shut down rational thinking ====
 
==== Overcoming cognitive dissonance in an evolutionist who has shut down rational thinking ====
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420

edits

Navigation menu