Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
29 bytes added ,  11:46, January 31, 2023
Line 38: Line 38:  
Below are signs of [[cognitive dissonance]] in an evolutionists engaged in a discussion/argument:  
 
Below are signs of [[cognitive dissonance]] in an evolutionists engaged in a discussion/argument:  
   −
*The person is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments
+
*The evolutionist is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments
   −
*The individual mischaracterizes the points/position of the other party - often in a dishonest way
+
*The evolutionist mischaracterizes the points/position of the other party - often in a dishonest way
   −
*The person myopically focuses on one variable/aspect of a matter rather than looking at the whole issue. See also: [[Fallacy of exclusion]]
+
*The evolutionist myopically focuses on one variable/aspect of a matter rather than looking at the whole issue. See also: [[Fallacy of exclusion]]
   −
*The individual engages in "mind reading" and baselessly attributes bad intentions in the other party  
+
*The evolutionist engages in "mind reading" and baselessly attributes bad intentions in the other party  
   −
*The person becomes angry - even when not provoked.
+
*The evolutionist becomes angry - even when not provoked.
   −
*Rather than focus on the matter at hand, the person engages in personal attacks. See also: [[Ad hominem]]
+
*Rather than focus on the matter at hand, the evolutionists engages in personal attacks. See also: [[Ad hominem]]
    
==== Overcoming cognitive dissonance in an evolutionist who has shut down rational thinking ====
 
==== Overcoming cognitive dissonance in an evolutionist who has shut down rational thinking ====
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920

edits

Navigation menu