Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
9,147
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + +
Black, dissenting
As well as:
As well as:
<blockquote>It is apparent that the noncontractual interest of an employee covered by the Act cannot be soundly analogized to that of the holder of an annuity, whose right to benefits is bottomed on his contractual premium payments.</blockquote>
<blockquote>It is apparent that the noncontractual interest of an employee covered by the Act cannot be soundly analogized to that of the holder of an annuity, whose right to benefits is bottomed on his contractual premium payments.</blockquote>
Justice [[Hugo Black]] stated in his dissent that:
<blockquote>I cannot believe that any private insurance company in America would be permitted to repudiate its matured contracts with its policyholders who have regularly paid all their premiums in reliance upon the good faith of the company.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=FwAUzN_iSWAC&pg=PA621 United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court], Volume 363</ref></blockquote>
==Legacy==
==Legacy==