Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Two forces drive January 6 jurisprudence
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''January 6 jurisprudence''' is the unique, one-sided set of rulings by [[Democrat]]-appointed federal judges in [[Washington, D.C.]] that rule against [[Trump]], his supporters and advisors, virtually every time no matter what the issue is.<ref>https://amgreatness.com/2023/02/25/mayor-pete-keeps-failing-upward/</ref>
 
'''January 6 jurisprudence''' is the unique, one-sided set of rulings by [[Democrat]]-appointed federal judges in [[Washington, D.C.]] that rule against [[Trump]], his supporters and advisors, virtually every time no matter what the issue is.<ref>https://amgreatness.com/2023/02/25/mayor-pete-keeps-failing-upward/</ref>
    +
Two forces drive January 6 jurisprudence:
 +
*a reaction by the [[Deep State]] to being humiliated
 +
*an attempt by the [[Deep State]] to expand its power as much as possible
 +
 
Characterizing the [[J6 Capitol protests]] as some kind violent resurrection is a central part of narrative of January 6 jurisprudence, resulting in nearly 1000 prosecutions of people who exercised [[First Amendment]] rights.
 
Characterizing the [[J6 Capitol protests]] as some kind violent resurrection is a central part of narrative of January 6 jurisprudence, resulting in nearly 1000 prosecutions of people who exercised [[First Amendment]] rights.
  
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Navigation menu