Changes

|2010

|2010

|PG

|PG

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can be seen as pro-environmentalist as well because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries as opposed to caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hard workers. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similarly to the other liberal film, ''Open Season'', it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', only in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' as opposed to film sequels.

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can be seen as pro-environmentalist as well because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries as opposed to caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hard workers. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similarly to the other liberal film ''Open Season'', it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', only in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' as opposed to film sequels.

|$25,107,267

|$25,107,267

|-

|-

|2012

|2012

|PG

|PG

|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. Also has a similar setting to Great Conservative Film; How to Train Your Dragon which was released two year before.

|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. Also has a similar setting to Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years before.

|$540.4 million  

|$540.4 million  

|-

|-

|2015

|2015

|PG

|PG

|The film begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that god does not exist. The film also seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth.

|The film begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. The film also seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth.

|$1.159 Billion

|$1.159 billion

|-

|-

|''Norm of the North''

|''Norm of the North''

|2016

|2016

|PG

|PG

|This poorly-received animation makes an environmentalist polar bear the hero and vilifies major businesses in the form of a greedy real estate mogul in a possible jab at Donald Trump. Three sequels promoting the same environmental message have been released since 2019.

|This poorly received animation makes an environmentalist polar bear the hero and vilifies major businesses in the form of a greedy real estate mogul in a possible jab at Donald Trump. Three sequels promoting the same environmental message have been released since 2019.

|$24.8 million

|$24.8 million

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters runs rampant.

|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters runs rampant. It had gotten three sequels since, each lowering in quality.

|$85,105,259   

|$85,105,259   

|-

|-

|2018

|2018

|G

|G

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him, and the various farm animals being portrayed positively in interfering with his business, with one of their plans against MacGregor even going so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had and it is treated in a positive manner. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic" that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel titled ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' is set to be released in 2021.

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him, while the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated in a positive manner. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic" that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel titled ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' was released in 2021.

|$146,983,492

|$146,983,492

|-

|-

|1995

|1995

|G

|G

|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would entered public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism.

|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism.

Also, unlike the film character who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  

Also, unlike the film character who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  

|1994

|1994

|G

|G

|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley exiled from the Land of Trolls and ends up in Central Park, meeting two children. He also ends up being a little ''too'' happy with a little girl kissing him on the cheek. The end of the movie has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City.

|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley exiled from the Land of Trolls and ends up in Central Park, meeting two children. He also ends up being a little ''too'' happy with a little girl kissing him on the cheek. The end of the movie has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth himself admitted that this was the worst movie he had created, a statement that many directors in the 2020s would never admit with their recent flops.

|$71,368

|$71,368

|-

|-

|Turning Red

|''Turning Red''

|2022

|2022

|PG (should be PG-13)

|PG (should be PG-13)