Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,905
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 107:
Line 107: + + + + + + + + + + + +
→RationalWiki's lack of appeal to a women audience
''See also:'' [[RationalWiki's lack of appeal to a women audience]] and [[Atheist websites appear to receive significantly less traffic from women]]
''See also:'' [[RationalWiki's lack of appeal to a women audience]] and [[Atheist websites appear to receive significantly less traffic from women]]
=== RationalWiki website's percentage of female visitors in January of 2023 ===
[[File:RationalWiki's percentage of female viewership fell since May of 2022 according to SimilarWeb.jpg|thumbnail|center|1200px|According to the leading web marketing website SimilarWeb.com, in January of 2023, RationalWiki's audience skewed heavily male.
<br />
<br />
In January of 2023, according to SimilarWeb.com, 67.54% of RationalWiki's web visitors were male. This represented a slight increase in its male viewership from May of 2022 according to SimilarWeb.com. In May of 2022, according to SimilarWeb.com, 66.36% of RationalWiki's web visitors were male (See graphic below).
<br />
<br />
In 2022, RationalWiki contributors failed to launch a major initiative to recruit more women editors nor was there a major increase in RationalWiki content related to women's issues. [[Wikipedia]] has an article entitled [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia Gender bias on Wikipedia]. RationalWiki does not have an article entitled "Gender bias at RationalWiki".]]
{{Clear}}
[[File:RationalWiki lack of appeal to a women audience.jpg|thumbnail|center|1200px|According to the leading web marketing website SimilarWeb.com, in May of 2022, RationalWiki's audience skewed heavily male.]]
[[File:RationalWiki lack of appeal to a women audience.jpg|thumbnail|center|1200px|According to the leading web marketing website SimilarWeb.com, in May of 2022, RationalWiki's audience skewed heavily male.]]