Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:  
{{cquote|... the Speech or Debate Clause bars this suit. The Court concludes that it does, and it therefore dismisses Meadows's claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.}}
 
{{cquote|... the Speech or Debate Clause bars this suit. The Court concludes that it does, and it therefore dismisses Meadows's claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.}}
 
''Meadows v. Pelosi'', Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-03217 (CJN), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198129, at *3 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2022).
 
''Meadows v. Pelosi'', Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-03217 (CJN), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198129, at *3 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2022).
 +
== Staffing decisions ==
 +
{{cquote|This court has held that a staffing decision of a Member of Congress is protected by the Speech or Debate Clause only insofar as the employee's duties are "directly related to the due functioning of the legislative process." ''Browning v. Clerk, House of Representatives'', 252 U.S. App. D.C. 241, 789 F.2d 923, 929 (1986) (discharge of Official Reporter protected under Speech or Debate Clause). Browning built upon our earlier decision in ''Walker v. Jones'', 236 U.S. App. D.C. 92, 733 F.2d 923, 931 (1984), where we held that the Speech or Debate Clause did not protect the decision to discharge the general manager of the House of Representatives restaurant system ....}}
 +
''United States v. Rostenkowski'', 313 U.S. App. D.C. 303, 59 F.3d 1291, 1302 (1995).
 
== Grand jury ==
 
== Grand jury ==
 
{{cquote|In summary, for the purpose of our jurisdictional analysis, we conclude that at least under some circumstances the Speech or Debate Clause prohibits not only reference to protected material on the face of an indictment but also the use of that material before the grand jury.}}
 
{{cquote|In summary, for the purpose of our jurisdictional analysis, we conclude that at least under some circumstances the Speech or Debate Clause prohibits not only reference to protected material on the face of an indictment but also the use of that material before the grand jury.}}
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits

Navigation menu