SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + +
Essay: Old progressives, new "right" (view source)
Revision as of 03:03, March 24, 2023
, 03:03, March 24, 2023→The TikTok hearing
The most prevailing excuse employed, that "we must look out after the children," reeks of [[concern troll]]ing. If the Democratic side were truly worried about children, would they not join the campaign against pedophiles who attempt to indoctrinate young children? And if the Republican side legitimately concerns for the plight of children, perhaps they wouldn't [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/boebert-praises-high-rural-teen-birth-rates-announces-shes-going-to-be-a-36-year-old-grandmother/ar-AA18v8lZ encourage premarital sex that results in children being brought up by morally degraded teenage bums incapable of controlling their impulsive sexual qualms].
The most prevailing excuse employed, that "we must look out after the children," reeks of [[concern troll]]ing. If the Democratic side were truly worried about children, would they not join the campaign against pedophiles who attempt to indoctrinate young children? And if the Republican side legitimately concerns for the plight of children, perhaps they wouldn't [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/boebert-praises-high-rural-teen-birth-rates-announces-shes-going-to-be-a-36-year-old-grandmother/ar-AA18v8lZ encourage premarital sex that results in children being brought up by morally degraded teenage bums incapable of controlling their impulsive sexual qualms].
I ought to note that I'm writing this as an individual who not at all supports TikTok. The app is filled with utter absurd perversions and degrading content, though the pernicious side in the effort to ''ban'' it cannot be simply ignored and downplayed, due to the greater symbolic significance it carries.
==Final notes==
==Final notes==