| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | <TR><TD VALIGN="top"><B>predecessor</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">[[Astyages]]</TD> | | <TR><TD VALIGN="top"><B>predecessor</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">[[Astyages]]</TD> |
| | <TR><TD><B>successor</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">[[Cyrus II the Great]]</TD></TR> | | <TR><TD><B>successor</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">[[Cyrus II the Great]]</TD></TR> |
| − | <TR><TD><B>birth</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">unknown</TD></TR> | + | <TR><TD><B>birth</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">c.600 BC</TD></TR> |
| | <TR><TD><B>death</B></TD><TD>Dec. 538 BC</TD></TR> | | <TR><TD><B>death</B></TD><TD>Dec. 538 BC</TD></TR> |
| | <TR><TD><B>spouse</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">unknown</TD> | | <TR><TD><B>spouse</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">unknown</TD> |
| − | <TR><TD VALIGN="top"><B>father</B></TD><TD>Astyages</TD></TR> | + | <TR><TD VALIGN="top"><B>father</B></TD><TD>[[Astyages]]</TD></TR> |
| | <TR><TD VALIGN="top"><B>mother</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">unknown</TD></TR> | | <TR><TD VALIGN="top"><B>mother</B></TD><TD VALIGN="top">unknown</TD></TR> |
| | </TABLE> | | </TABLE> |
| | </FONT> | | </FONT> |
| | | | |
| − | '''Cyaxares II''', who is claimed by some to also be known as '''Darius the Mede''', is the alleged son and successor of the legendary [[Astyages]], King of the [[Medes]] in [[Ecbatana]] who reigned from 561 to 536 BC according to Barnes’ Notes,<ref>Barnes' Notes on the Bible, Daniel 9:1.[https://biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes/daniel/9.htm]</ref> but for whom a better ending date might be late 538 BC (see below). The generally accepted narrative is that the throne passed straight from [[Astyages]] to [[Cyrus the Great]]. | + | '''Cyaxares II''', who is claimed by some to also be known as '''[[Darius the Mede]]''', is the alleged son and successor of the legendary [[Ahasuerus]], "King of Kings", [[Astyages]], King of the [[Medes]] in [[Ecbatana]] who reigned from 561 to 536 BC according to Barnes’ Notes,<ref>Barnes' Notes on the Bible, Daniel 9:1.[https://biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes/daniel/9.htm]</ref> but for whom a better ending date might be late 538 BC (see below). |
| | + | |
| | + | Since ''Cyaxares II'' does not appear in either the known imperfect [[Uruk King List]] or the [[Canon of Ptolemy]], the generally accepted narrative supported by the 'known-to-be' questionable [[Herodotus]], is that ''Cyaxares II'' is fictional and that the the throne of Media passed straight from [[Astyages]] to [[Cyrus the Great]]. |
| | | | |
| | == Original Sources == | | == Original Sources == |
| | The son of [[Astyages]], [[Cyaxares II]] (not to be confused with [[Cyaxares I]], father of [[Astyages]]) does not ''specifically'' exist in any surviving or currently available extant cuniform tablets or the likes; but he does possibly exist with a potential dual reference in the absolutely monumental [[bas-relief]] [[Behistun (inscription)|Behistun Inscription]] (''see below''). | | The son of [[Astyages]], [[Cyaxares II]] (not to be confused with [[Cyaxares I]], father of [[Astyages]]) does not ''specifically'' exist in any surviving or currently available extant cuniform tablets or the likes; but he does possibly exist with a potential dual reference in the absolutely monumental [[bas-relief]] [[Behistun (inscription)|Behistun Inscription]] (''see below''). |
| | | | |
| − | Meanwhile the strongest ''specific'' literary evidence for his existence lies within the pages [[Xenophon|Xenohon's]] crowning work, the ''[[Cyropaedia]]'', who as a Greek military commander served in [[Cyrus the Younger|Cyrus']] army. This work was so highly prized by [[Alexander the Great]], that he made it his perpetual study;<ref>Xenophon, ''Cyropaedia'', Introduction, Delphi Classics, 2013, Hastings, UK</ref> by extension it was obviously also recommended to him by his mentor and tutor [[Aristotle]],<ref>[[Quintus Curtius Rufus]] History of Alexander, 1.9</ref>. Likewise did [[Julius Caesar]].<ref>Xenophon, ''Cyropaedia'' Introduction, Delphi Classics, 2013, Hastings, UK</ref> Meanwhile [[Scipio Africanus]] is reported to have carried it with him everywhere.<ref>Xenophon, 'Cyropaedia'', Introduction, Delphi Classics, 2013, Hastings, UK</ref> This combined with a possible identity match with [[Josephus|Josephus']] [[Darius the Mede|Darius, King of Media]],<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities of the Jews'', 10.11.2.[https://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/josephus/ant-10.htm]</ref> "the son of Astyages, [who] had another name among the Greeks"<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities of the Jews'', 10.11.4.[https://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/josephus/ant-10.htm]</ref> creates a good case. Compoundingly, two of the rebels listed in [[Darius I|Darius I's]] [[Behistun (inscription)|Behistun Inscription]] claimed "to be of the family of Cyaxares": which has naturally created debate if these are references to [[Cyaxares I]] or to the possible [[Cyaxares II]]. Finally those who accept the [[Book of Daniel]] to be true, note that it was [[Darius the Mede]] who officially seized the kingdom,<ref>Daniel 5:31</ref> which happily correlates all three of these literary sources to their reasoning. | + | Meanwhile the strongest ''specific'' literary evidence for his existence lies within the pages [[Xenophon|Xenohon's]] crowning work, the ''[[Cyropaedia]]'', who as a Greek military commander served in [[Cyrus the Younger|Cyrus the Younger's]] army. This work was so highly prized by [[Alexander the Great]], that he made it his perpetual study;<ref>Xenophon, ''Cyropaedia'', Introduction, Delphi Classics, 2013, Hastings, UK</ref> by extension it was obviously also recommended to him by his mentor and tutor [[Aristotle]],<ref>[[Quintus Curtius Rufus]] History of Alexander, 1.9</ref>. Likewise did [[Julius Caesar]].<ref>Xenophon, ''Cyropaedia'' Introduction, Delphi Classics, 2013, Hastings, UK</ref> Meanwhile [[Scipio Africanus]] is reported to have carried it with him everywhere.<ref>Xenophon, 'Cyropaedia'', Introduction, Delphi Classics, 2013, Hastings, UK</ref> This combined with a possible identity match with [[Josephus|Josephus']] [[Darius the Mede|Darius, King of Media]],<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities of the Jews'', 10.11.2.[https://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/josephus/ant-10.htm]</ref> "the son of Astyages, [who] had another name among the Greeks"<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities of the Jews'', 10.11.4.[https://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/josephus/ant-10.htm]</ref> creates a good case. Compoundingly, two of the rebels listed in [[Darius I|Darius I's]] [[Behistun (inscription)|Behistun Inscription]] claimed "to be of the family of Cyaxares": which has naturally created debate if these are references to [[Cyaxares I]] or to the possible [[Cyaxares II]]. Finally those who accept the [[Book of Daniel]] to be true, note that it was [[Darius the Mede]] who officially seized the kingdom,<ref>Daniel 5:31</ref> which happily correlates all three of these literary sources to their reasoning. |
| | | | |
| | Alternatively, [[Cyaxares II]] does not appear in [[Ptolemy's Canon]]<ref>Livius, Ptolemy's ''Canon''. [https://www.livius.org/articles/concept/ptolemys-canon/]</ref> or the [[Uruk King List]].<ref>Livius, Uruk King List.[https://www.livius.org/sources/content/uruk-king-list/]</ref> But neither of these feature [[Belshazzar]] who became effective king of Babylon after his father [[Nabonidas]] capture now confirmed to us by the Nabonidus Cylinder (from Ur).<ref>Livius, ''Nabonidus Cylinder from Ur''.[https://www.livius.org/sources/content/nabonidus-cylinder-from-ur/]</ref><ref>Livius, ''ABC 7 (Nabonidus Chronicle)'', Column iii.16.[https://www.livius.org/sources/content/mesopotamian-chronicles-content/abc-7-nabonidus-chronicle/]</ref> Similarly [[Ptolemy's Canon|Ptolemy]] does not list [[Nerglissar|Nerglissar's]] son [[Labasi-Marduk]] while the [[Uruk King List|Uruk]] does. | | Alternatively, [[Cyaxares II]] does not appear in [[Ptolemy's Canon]]<ref>Livius, Ptolemy's ''Canon''. [https://www.livius.org/articles/concept/ptolemys-canon/]</ref> or the [[Uruk King List]].<ref>Livius, Uruk King List.[https://www.livius.org/sources/content/uruk-king-list/]</ref> But neither of these feature [[Belshazzar]] who became effective king of Babylon after his father [[Nabonidas]] capture now confirmed to us by the Nabonidus Cylinder (from Ur).<ref>Livius, ''Nabonidus Cylinder from Ur''.[https://www.livius.org/sources/content/nabonidus-cylinder-from-ur/]</ref><ref>Livius, ''ABC 7 (Nabonidus Chronicle)'', Column iii.16.[https://www.livius.org/sources/content/mesopotamian-chronicles-content/abc-7-nabonidus-chronicle/]</ref> Similarly [[Ptolemy's Canon|Ptolemy]] does not list [[Nerglissar|Nerglissar's]] son [[Labasi-Marduk]] while the [[Uruk King List|Uruk]] does. |
| Line 25: |
Line 27: |
| | Clearly, legitimate debate over these sources does exist. Therefore in the following sections we shall examine these sources in more detail. | | Clearly, legitimate debate over these sources does exist. Therefore in the following sections we shall examine these sources in more detail. |
| | | | |
| − | === In the works of Xenophon === | + | ===In the Book of Daniel=== |
| | + | If one accepts that '''Cyaxares II'' and '''Darius the Mede''' are the same individual, then what is known in this [[cannonical book]] is that: |
| | + | * as the kingdom of Babylon officially falls, ''Cyaxares II'' recevies the title of King of Babylon, after [[Cyrus II the Great]]'s conquest |
| | + | * the angle "strengthened" ''Cyaxares II'' in that "first year" as king of [[Babylon]] |
| | + | * the story of Daniel and the Lions Den has every indication of happening very soon after the conquest of Babylon. |
| | + | * Darius is noted as being the ''son'' of "the great king" of the Medes (which can only refer to [[Astyages]] as there isn't another candidate) |
| | + | * Darius was "made" king and "took" the kingdom of Babylon, not conquered it for himself. |
| | + | |
| | + | Therefore we must note that all of these statements are in harmony with the statements of [[Xenophon]], [[Josephus]], [[Megasthenes]], the implications of the [[Behistun Inscription]] and the habit of [[Ptolemy's Canon]] to exclude kings who do not reign for less than one calander year. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===In the works of Xenophon=== |
| | According to [[Xenophon]], ''Cyaxares II'' ruled as king after the natural death of [[Astyages]] and sought to defended [[Medes|Media]] from Assyrian/[[Babylonia|Babylonian]] aggression, promoting his yet unascended nephew [[Cyrus II the Great|Cyrus]] as General/leader of the allied forces. Furthermore, [[Xenophon]] in great detail records the history of [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus']] pre-emptive strike and campaigns with ''Cyaxares II'', the first battle of which the king of Babylon (probably [[Neriglissar]]) was decisively defeated and slain. During the plunder of this battle [[Cyaxares II]] and [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] were separated and Cyrus continued to campaign alone with [[Cyaxares II]] eventually returning to [[Ecbatana]]. The volume records how Cyrus fused the alliance of nations under his banner until after several years Cyrus stands at the very gates of [[Babylon]] itself. [[Xenophon]] then very significantly records how after the conquest of [[Babylon]], [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] travelled to [[Ecbatana]] wherein he met [[Cyaxares II]], gifting him a palace in Babylon and accepted the hand of his daughter with the Kingdom of Media as her dowry. [[Xenophon]] then records how [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] travelled to Persia after the death of his father [[Cambyses I]] to receive his father's office. | | According to [[Xenophon]], ''Cyaxares II'' ruled as king after the natural death of [[Astyages]] and sought to defended [[Medes|Media]] from Assyrian/[[Babylonia|Babylonian]] aggression, promoting his yet unascended nephew [[Cyrus II the Great|Cyrus]] as General/leader of the allied forces. Furthermore, [[Xenophon]] in great detail records the history of [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus']] pre-emptive strike and campaigns with ''Cyaxares II'', the first battle of which the king of Babylon (probably [[Neriglissar]]) was decisively defeated and slain. During the plunder of this battle [[Cyaxares II]] and [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] were separated and Cyrus continued to campaign alone with [[Cyaxares II]] eventually returning to [[Ecbatana]]. The volume records how Cyrus fused the alliance of nations under his banner until after several years Cyrus stands at the very gates of [[Babylon]] itself. [[Xenophon]] then very significantly records how after the conquest of [[Babylon]], [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] travelled to [[Ecbatana]] wherein he met [[Cyaxares II]], gifting him a palace in Babylon and accepted the hand of his daughter with the Kingdom of Media as her dowry. [[Xenophon]] then records how [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] travelled to Persia after the death of his father [[Cambyses I]] to receive his father's office. |
| | | | |