Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
The '''Date of the Gospel of Mark''' is unjustifiably pegged to the destruction of the Second Temple in AD 70, based very loosely on the eschatological, end-of-the-world talk in {{bibleref|Mark|13}}.
 
The '''Date of the Gospel of Mark''' is unjustifiably pegged to the destruction of the Second Temple in AD 70, based very loosely on the eschatological, end-of-the-world talk in {{bibleref|Mark|13}}.
   −
In fact, three considerations point to a date soon after the [[Resurrection]]:
+
In fact, four considerations point to a date soon after the [[Resurrection]]:
 
*the [[Gospel of Mark]] omits subsequent events after the Resurrection;
 
*the [[Gospel of Mark]] omits subsequent events after the Resurrection;
 
*the Gospel of Mark contains remarkable detail that would fade if written long afterwards;
 
*the Gospel of Mark contains remarkable detail that would fade if written long afterwards;
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,496

edits

Navigation menu