SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + +
→A few issues in the article
:You raise some interesting and valid points. IMO, this article should be written in context with our [[Black History]] article, and not have an Angelo-American Eurocentric white supremacist institutionally racist perspective common in academia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:48, May 18, 2023 (EDT)
:You raise some interesting and valid points. IMO, this article should be written in context with our [[Black History]] article, and not have an Angelo-American Eurocentric white supremacist institutionally racist perspective common in academia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:48, May 18, 2023 (EDT)
::Thanks; and as a whole, Conservapedia can drastically renovate and expand civil rights/black history–related articles into a comprehensive series. What most on the political right fail to do is actually provide a meaningful alternative to the Marxist distortions of civil rights history—this is where we have an excellent opportunity to actually inform history-intrigued folks properly. I'm back to developing the series about anti-lynching legislation history in the U.S. (and no, the bill Biden signed doesn't count, because it was pointless and merely for deceptive optics), and despite Conservapedia's currently abysmal page view growth overall, I see an opportunity in more of the long-run to gain a decent readership. And man, will the leftists be irritated to see my massive compilation of evidence implicating New Deal liberalism as the hindrance to civil rights! —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Matthew 26:52)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 14:56, May 18, 2023 (EDT)