nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 27:
Line 27: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Political Profiling (view source)
Revision as of 19:25, September 8, 2007
, 19:25, September 8, 2007Talk:Political profiling moved to Talk:Political Profiling
::::This '''classic''' language of Mr. Chip Berlet. Laird Wilcox's chapter in Berlet in ''The Watchdogs'', is entitled, ''Chip Berlet and Political Research Associates, A Sutdy in Links and Ties'', pgs. 114 - 131, the link is available at my user page, User:RobS, is RW. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:35, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
::::This '''classic''' language of Mr. Chip Berlet. Laird Wilcox's chapter in Berlet in ''The Watchdogs'', is entitled, ''Chip Berlet and Political Research Associates, A Sutdy in Links and Ties'', pgs. 114 - 131, the link is available at my user page, User:RobS, is RW. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:35, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
== Summary ==
If you could, read this and let me know if I have it right. Thanks.
So, certain organizations follow the edits of particular individuals on line and record them and establish a pattern. They then use the pattern of that individual's posts to profile them into a certain category, say, neonazi, etc. If the person's edits don't add up to neonazi, they just call them one anyway, making the data collection moot. Or, if they ''do'' add up to neo-nazi,it's bad to tell others because it would smear them? Im just a little lost.[[User:Frederick|Frederick]] 10:58, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
==Thank you==
to whoever unlocked the talk page. I agree with many of the comments above, at least the ones i understand. Could someone, like the author, explain this article in simple terms?[[User:Massimo|Massimo]] 15:55, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
:What's your question. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:20, 13 June 2007 (EDT)