Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,801
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 562:
Line 562: − − == RationalWiki's cowardly refusal to debate Conservapedian User: Conservative == − − ''See also:'' [[Atheism and cowardice]] and [[Atheism and anxiety]] and [[Atheism and mental toughness]] − − [[File:Richard Dawkins at Global Atheism Convention.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|251px|right|The Oxford University Professor [[Daniel Came]] wrote to the New Atheist [[Richard Dawkins]]:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for Christian [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref name="telegraph.co.uk">[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', May 14, 2011</ref> See also: [[Atheism and cowardice]] ]] − Initially, in order to taunt RationalWikians, the [[Conservapedia]]n [[User: Conservative]] offered to debate the RationalWikian Ace McWicked, if he agreed to donate $17,000 to a Christian relief organization of his choice. User: Conservative stipulated that the money be given to a third party of his choice. Instead, Ace McWicked merely agreed to give it to one of his relatives which is a condition User: Conservative refused to find acceptable. − − Later, User: Conservative repeatedly won debates against RationalWikians using various sockpuppets at their website - despite RationalWiki attempting to futilely block him. The RationalWikian User: Brx noted that they could no longer falsely claim that User: Conservative was afraid to debate them after repeatedly blocking him. RationalWikians, supposedly permablocked User: Conservative, after holding a sham trial at their website which failed to meet the 66% vote threshold that they supposedly required in order to permanently block someone (Please the screencapture below). − − To this day, RationalWikian Ace McWicked has an only autocomfirmed users can post on his talk page setting because he is afraid to debate User: Conservative about the [[Arguments for the existence of God|existence of God]]. Like all atheists, Ace McWicked [[Atheist apologetics|lacks proof and evidence that atheism is true]] and he is not able to effectively counter the multiple lines of evidence indicating that Christianity is true (See: [[Christian apologetics websites|Evidence for Christianity]]). − − User: Conservative has noted a number of times that it is not due to his debating prowess that he easily and effortlessly wins debates against atheists. It is due to the utter weakness of the [[atheist worldview]]. − − In recent times, there have been a number of notable cases of prominent atheists cowardly refusing to debate Christians and even pulling out of agreed-upon debates at the 11th hour (See: [[Atheism and cowardice]]). When atheists do debate Christians they generally lose their debates badly (See: [[Atheism debates]] and [[Atheism vs. Christianity debates]] and [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]]). − === After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the User: Conservative account at Conservapedia, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground === − − [[File:RationalWiki admits Conservapedian has moral high ground.jpg|thumbnail|900px|center|After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the [[User: Conservative]] account at RationalWiki, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground. Administrator Brx basically admits that blocking him was cowardly. LeftyGreenMario then essentially acknowledges that RationalWiki does not have the moral high ground and cedes moral high ground to administrator User: Conservative at Conservapedia. See also: [[Atheism debates]] and [[Atheism and cowardice]] ]] − {{clear}}
→RationalWiki's cowardly refusal to debate Conservapedian User: Conservative
It was recently [https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/inflation-cpi#:~:text=US%20Inflation%20Rate%20Rises%20to,above%20market%20forecasts%20of%208.8%25.reported] that the annual inflation rate in the USA accelerated to 9.1% in June of 2022. Reuters [https://freopp.org/switzerland-health-system-profile-1-in-the-world-index-of-healthcare-innovation-e4f513a20f19 reported] that Swiss inflation in June hits 29-year high of 3.4%. The Biden administration did a lot of money printing, a lot of federal government spending and it had very anti domestic fossil fuel policy plus it did not handle Covid-19 well. This largely explains why the USA has a higher inflation rate than Switzerland. In addition, the USA spends a lot on its military and funding the Ukrainian military during the war in Ukraine. Lipsen (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
It was recently [https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/inflation-cpi#:~:text=US%20Inflation%20Rate%20Rises%20to,above%20market%20forecasts%20of%208.8%25.reported] that the annual inflation rate in the USA accelerated to 9.1% in June of 2022. Reuters [https://freopp.org/switzerland-health-system-profile-1-in-the-world-index-of-healthcare-innovation-e4f513a20f19 reported] that Swiss inflation in June hits 29-year high of 3.4%. The Biden administration did a lot of money printing, a lot of federal government spending and it had very anti domestic fossil fuel policy plus it did not handle Covid-19 well. This largely explains why the USA has a higher inflation rate than Switzerland. In addition, the USA spends a lot on its military and funding the Ukrainian military during the war in Ukraine. Lipsen (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
== See also ==
== See also ==