Changes

Wash. All. Tech Workers v. U.S. Dep’t Homeland Sec., 50 F.4th 164 (D.C. Cir. 2022)  

Wash. All. Tech Workers v. U.S. Dep’t Homeland Sec., 50 F.4th 164 (D.C. Cir. 2022)  

Wash. All. Tech Workers v. U.S. Dep’t Homeland Sec., 58 F.4th 506 (D.C. Cir. 2023)  

Wash. All. Tech Workers v. U.S. Dep’t Homeland Sec., 58 F.4th 506 (D.C. Cir. 2023) (denial of the petition for rehearing en banc, which is notable for the compelling dissent by Judge Rao; Judge Henderson incorporated her panel dissent into this court decision)  

''[[West Virginia v. EPA]]'', 142 S. Ct. 2587, 2605 (2022) (establishing [[major questions doctrine]], and emphasizing that the Court “‘expect[s] Congress to speak clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast economic and political significance.’”)(quoting ''Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Env’t Prot. Agency'', 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)).

''[[West Virginia v. EPA]]'', 142 S. Ct. 2587, 2605 (2022) (establishing [[major questions doctrine]], and emphasizing that the Court “‘expect[s] Congress to speak clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast economic and political significance.’”)(quoting ''Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Env’t Prot. Agency'', 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)).