Changes

::Ah, I see; I was scouring for about two years to read more of your scholarly journal entries, and at last, I instinctively felt that I found another one yesterday! Also, does your "Challenging the Status Quo" article also mention anything about Fielding L. Wright, the vice presidential nominee for the SRP ticket in 1948? I can't believe Conservapedia doesn't have an article about him yet; it would be awesome if you can one started. I got several other series to cover on Conservapedia, and since you're the main expert on Southern politics, I think it would be best if you create it and I'll add on as could be expanded. I'm fascinated in fully comprehending the shift from New Dealism in the 1930s to the new "conservative" order by the 50s which evidently was impacted by the changing nature of ideology and civil rights that hastened during the WWII years when, for example, labor unions became a beneficiary for civil rights causes and price controls began to alienate rural whites which comprised the old progressive/populist base in the South. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{(Matthew 26:52)}]]''''' Tuesday, 11:25, May 16, 2023 (EDT)

::Ah, I see; I was scouring for about two years to read more of your scholarly journal entries, and at last, I instinctively felt that I found another one yesterday! Also, does your "Challenging the Status Quo" article also mention anything about Fielding L. Wright, the vice presidential nominee for the SRP ticket in 1948? I can't believe Conservapedia doesn't have an article about him yet; it would be awesome if you can one started. I got several other series to cover on Conservapedia, and since you're the main expert on Southern politics, I think it would be best if you create it and I'll add on as could be expanded. I'm fascinated in fully comprehending the shift from New Dealism in the 1930s to the new "conservative" order by the 50s which evidently was impacted by the changing nature of ideology and civil rights that hastened during the WWII years when, for example, labor unions became a beneficiary for civil rights causes and price controls began to alienate rural whites which comprised the old progressive/populist base in the South. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{(Matthew 26:52)}]]''''' Tuesday, 11:25, May 16, 2023 (EDT)

::Oh, and another thing on mind since I'm here: were "Longism" and "anti-Longism" ideological lines of thought distinct enough to be validly designated with such terms? I notice in numerous articles written by you on Louisiana politicians that you note whether individuals were "pro-Long" or "anti-Long." Those mentions usually just link to the [[Huey Long]] or [[Earl Long]] articles (I assume depending on the time period that the individual was active in politics), though possibly with new pages on "Longism" and "Anti-Longism," they can link to such articles instead. What are your thoughts? —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{(Matthew 26:52)}]]''''' Tuesday, 11:31, May 16, 2023 (EDT)

::Oh, and another thing on mind since I'm here: were "Longism" and "anti-Longism" ideological lines of thought distinct enough to be validly designated with such terms? I notice in numerous articles written by you on Louisiana politicians that you note whether individuals were "pro-Long" or "anti-Long." Those mentions usually just link to the [[Huey Long]] or [[Earl Long]] articles (I assume depending on the time period that the individual was active in politics), though possibly with new pages on "Longism" and "Anti-Longism," they can link to such articles instead. What are your thoughts? —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{(Matthew 26:52)}]]''''' Tuesday, 11:31, May 16, 2023 (EDT)