==U.S. Senate: filibuster, Republican inability to overcome==
==U.S. Senate: filibuster, Republican inability to overcome==
−
"Old Guard" conservative Republican senator [[Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr.]], the sponsor of the Federal Elections Bill of 1890, initiated the legislative introduction of the Dyer Bill into the Senate though placated the party's side of the debate into [[California]] colleague Samuel M. Shortridge,<ref name=greenidge>Greenidge, Kerry K. (November 19, 2019). [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Black_Radical_The_Life_and_Times_of_Will/SwOLDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=dyer+bill+lodge+shortridge&pg=PP287&printsec=frontcover Black Radical: The Life and Times of William Monroe Trotter]. ''Google Books''. Retrieved May 28, 2023.</ref> a diligent supporter of the anti-lynching legislation praised by the NAACP:<ref name=thecrisis1921,p.216-17>National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (1921). [https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Crisis/KqMTAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=dyer+bill+lodge+shortridge&pg=RA2-PA216&printsec=frontcover The Crisis: Vols. 22–24], pp. 216–17. ''Google Books''. Retrieved May 28, 2023.</ref>
+
At first, optimism was high about Senate passage—the Republicans controlled the chamber 59–37, needing only the support from five additional Democratic senators (assuming firm GOP unity behind the Bill) to reach the 64-senator threshold needed to overcome a filibuster.<ref name=talbert/>
+
+
"Old Guard" conservative Republican senator [[Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr.]], the sponsor of the Federal Elections Bill of 1890, initiated the legislative introduction of the Dyer Bill into the Senate though eventually placated the party's side of the debate into [[California]] colleague Samuel M. Shortridge,<ref name=greenidge>Greenidge, Kerry K. (November 19, 2019). [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Black_Radical_The_Life_and_Times_of_Will/SwOLDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=dyer+bill+lodge+shortridge&pg=PP287&printsec=frontcover Black Radical: The Life and Times of William Monroe Trotter]. ''Google Books''. Retrieved May 28, 2023.</ref> a diligent supporter of the anti-lynching legislation praised by the NAACP:<ref name=thecrisis1921,p.216-17>National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (1921). [https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Crisis/KqMTAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=dyer+bill+lodge+shortridge&pg=RA2-PA216&printsec=frontcover The Crisis: Vols. 22–24], pp. 216–17. ''Google Books''. Retrieved May 28, 2023.</ref>
{{cquote|We are extremely fortunate in having Senator Shortridge chosen to lead the fight for the bill. He is the one member of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary who has all along held the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill to be entirely constitutional. A number of the other Republican members were in favor of the bill and pledged their support, but were doubtful about the constitutionality of certain of its provisions. Senator Shortridge has all along stood one hundred per cent for the bill. Furthermore, Senator Shortridge is a brave fighter. In the discussions which took place in the Committee he never hesitated to meet the stock arguments of the southern members of the Committee with a frontal attack and demolish them. When these southern members put up the subtle argument of white man to white man, that if the Anti-Lynching Bill were enacted it would encourage the crime of rape among Negroes in the South, Senator Shortridge met them with facts and statistics and hammered them into silence.|||NAACP, 1921}}
{{cquote|We are extremely fortunate in having Senator Shortridge chosen to lead the fight for the bill. He is the one member of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary who has all along held the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill to be entirely constitutional. A number of the other Republican members were in favor of the bill and pledged their support, but were doubtful about the constitutionality of certain of its provisions. Senator Shortridge has all along stood one hundred per cent for the bill. Furthermore, Senator Shortridge is a brave fighter. In the discussions which took place in the Committee he never hesitated to meet the stock arguments of the southern members of the Committee with a frontal attack and demolish them. When these southern members put up the subtle argument of white man to white man, that if the Anti-Lynching Bill were enacted it would encourage the crime of rape among Negroes in the South, Senator Shortridge met them with facts and statistics and hammered them into silence.|||NAACP, 1921}}