Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 184:
Line 184: − − ==Addressing extraneous matters== − LT, I suggest you actually address what I wrote next time. I never said that Ukraine doesn't have a neo-Nazi problem. I explicitly said that they do albeit not as big as RobS and Putin state. Next, I will never adhere to some of your bizarre and/or errant theological positions which are not biblically sound (If one does careful [[Bible exegesis]]) and/or ahistorical and are promulgated by a church which has a very low retention rate (Namely, the [[Seventh-day Adventist Church]]). − − As far as RationalWiki (RW) goes, they are a bunch of cowards who fail to support their various contentions and heavily censor their wiki as evidenced by their low [[Essay: Edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki|edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki]]. But that censorship comes at a price. For example, they have had two distinct drop trends in their web traffic historically. The first occurred in the latter part of 2019 due to Google devaluing their search results in a big way. The second trend of lower and lower web traffic occurred right after they supposedly permabanned me (By breaking their own rule that said a vote of 66% is required to permaban someone. Nevertheless, I occasionally create sockpuppet accounts as of late). Now their website is becoming blander and blander due to their insipid and boring [[secular left|secular leftist]] pablum that less and less people want to read. − − Lastly, you can rail over and over about my alleged copypastas/spam, but that doesn't negate the fact that my content still gets a lot of views (For example, [[Conservapedia:Atheism articles statistics]]) and that my content has been cited by a number of notable conservative organizations/individuals (Concerned Women of America, etc.) and conservative/liberal news outlets such as the Chicago Tribune, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:57, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − − :LT, please stay focused on the topic subheading. Other matters such as RW or Sheol, and personal criticism, only derail discussion. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:07, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − ::LT has become nastier and nastier towards me ever since I accepted some of his requests to debate theological matters related to Seventh-day Adventist Church. If he didn't want to hear contrary theologically views, he should have never asked me to debate. I did debate him cordially so his nastiness towards me is unwarranted. Now I don't bother accepting his theological debate offers and it is partly due to his nastiness. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:16, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − :::Those debates and discussions should be confined to the appropriate threads and pages, and not spill over into discussion on unrelated topics. Both you guys need to show restraint on that matter. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:18, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − − ::::To reply to Conservative, my bold polemics in debates over Christian theology began not a result of his initial willingness to debate, rather much before then. Furthermore, my "nastiness" is not because of his initial willingness, but later unwillingness to have an in-depth discussion despite his persistence to share ''his'' preferred topics in voice calls. − ::::In response to RobSmith, you yourself have derailed numerous discussions in the past. In [[Talk:Markan priority]], when I brought up an insight on the ordering of events between the Synoptic Gospels which indicates Markan priority over the Augustinian hypothesis, you turned the discussion into yet another inefficient debate over the Sabbath. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Matthew 26:52)</sup>]]''''' Tuesday, 15:39, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − :::::Sorry. I'm an idiot. Please forgive me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 16:43, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − ::::::LT, I didn't want to go over and over the same theological topics in debate. Upon your request, I debated you before on those same topics. And for those theological issues, I didn't have a strong interest in debating you on those topics the first time. So there was not enough interest on my part to do a second round of debate on those same topics. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:14, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − − :::::::[EC] Around one-thirds to half of the time in those debates, you merely posted the opinions of external sites and barely formulated conclusive, Bible-based arguments yourself. And much of those points employed logical fallacies, such as presuming the validity of a doctrine based on majority opinion, i.e. "soul sleep is rejected by Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox Christians," etc. − :::::::Given how much you've written about Christianity on this site as a presumed expert, surely you would understand these doctrinal differences through and through? After all, what's the point of Christianity if it's merely reduced to ecumenical accommodation without doctrinal rigidity? What use is promoting Christianity through SEO internet evangelism if you ultimately propagate a watered-down variant which ultimately does not save "converts" from destruction because, let's say, the sites whose traffic you increase promote dangerous doctrines like [[once saved, always saved]]? [[Got Questions Ministries]] and [[CARM]] promote that line of thought. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>(Matthew 26:52)</sup>]]''''' Tuesday, 17:19, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − ::::::::I have never said I was an expert in Christianity at this website or anywhere else. So if you presumed that I am an expert in Christianity that was your choice. But being a Christian, I do have a high interest in Christianity. Most of my content on this website was on atheism, [[creation]]/[[evolution]] and homosexuality. At this juncture, I rarely think about homosexuality and my interest in the topic of atheism has greatly waned. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:32, May 30, 2023 (EDT) − Also, I gave you a list of religious forums to discuss the theological topics you wanted to discuss with someone so you have no legitimate reason to be angry at me let alone be nasty at me. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:32, May 30, 2023 (EDT)
→Addressing extraneous matters
Either way it's really rough draft and I'm hoping for a lot of help with the community to format it and also to add many many more examples. Well there's no shortage of left-wing bullshit cataloging of every single example of a priest that molest two children there's almost zero examples of an actual database for transgrooming and molestation and I think we need to start some..
Either way it's really rough draft and I'm hoping for a lot of help with the community to format it and also to add many many more examples. Well there's no shortage of left-wing bullshit cataloging of every single example of a priest that molest two children there's almost zero examples of an actual database for transgrooming and molestation and I think we need to start some..