| | In 1881, Cambridge scholars B. F Westcott and F. J. A. Hort, two prominent antibiblical occultists,<ref>Bruggeman, James. [http://pdf.amazingdiscoveries.org/References/TO/213/TO213_S131-The_Political_and_Occult_Connections_of_Westcott_and_Hort.pdf The Political & Occult Connections of Westcott & Hort Fathers of Modern Bible Versions Were Also Among Fathers of the New Age Movement Also Linked to the Powerful Family Behind the British Monarchy]. ''Amazing Discoveries''. Retrieved June 10, 2023.</ref> used Vaticanus as a basis for a Greek text of the New Testament, now called the Westcott–Hort or Alexandrian text. Some parts of Vaticanus are missing or damaged. Hebrews ends at 9:14 and the Pastorals, Philemon, and Revelation are missing. Westcott and Hort used [[Codex Sinaiticus]], an uncial manuscript nearly as old as Vaticanus, to fill in these gaps. Revelation was taken from [[Codex Alexandrinus]], a fifth century uncial. In more recent times, the Biblical quotations used by the church fathers have been cataloged and papyrus scrolls of various New Testament books have been found. Both of these sources are older than the uncial manuscripts. Yet they tend to confirm the validity of the Westcott–Hort text.{{fact}} | | In 1881, Cambridge scholars B. F Westcott and F. J. A. Hort, two prominent antibiblical occultists,<ref>Bruggeman, James. [http://pdf.amazingdiscoveries.org/References/TO/213/TO213_S131-The_Political_and_Occult_Connections_of_Westcott_and_Hort.pdf The Political & Occult Connections of Westcott & Hort Fathers of Modern Bible Versions Were Also Among Fathers of the New Age Movement Also Linked to the Powerful Family Behind the British Monarchy]. ''Amazing Discoveries''. Retrieved June 10, 2023.</ref> used Vaticanus as a basis for a Greek text of the New Testament, now called the Westcott–Hort or Alexandrian text. Some parts of Vaticanus are missing or damaged. Hebrews ends at 9:14 and the Pastorals, Philemon, and Revelation are missing. Westcott and Hort used [[Codex Sinaiticus]], an uncial manuscript nearly as old as Vaticanus, to fill in these gaps. Revelation was taken from [[Codex Alexandrinus]], a fifth century uncial. In more recent times, the Biblical quotations used by the church fathers have been cataloged and papyrus scrolls of various New Testament books have been found. Both of these sources are older than the uncial manuscripts. Yet they tend to confirm the validity of the Westcott–Hort text.{{fact}} |
| − | Codices Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, used as the basis for modern translations gloated by Roman Catholics as an "exoneration" of Jesuit Bibles from early Protestant critics, apparently omitted the Pastoral Epistles for directly refuting beliefs held by [[Origen]] which were adopted by the Catholic Church; [https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1-Timothy-2-5/ 1 Timothy 2:5] asserts only a single mediator, Jesus Christ, between God and men, contradicting Roman Catholicism's teaching that individuals must confess their sins before a priest in addition to praying to Mary and the saints.
| + | Codex Vaticanus used along with Sinaiticus as the basis for modern translations gloated by Roman Catholics as an "exoneration" of Jesuit Bibles from early Protestant critics, apparently omits the Pastoral Epistles for directly refuting beliefs held by [[Origen]] which were adopted by the Catholic Church; [https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1-Timothy-2-5/ 1 Timothy 2:5] asserts only a single mediator, Jesus Christ, between God and men, contradicting Roman Catholicism's teaching that individuals must confess their sins before a priest in addition to praying to Mary and the saints. |