5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 15:22, 26 May 2007 (EDT)+ − − == Number of articles == − − you later! [[User:Dannyhorn|Dannyhorn]] 14:09, 27 May 2007 (EDT) − − |Dannyhorn]] 14:16, 27 May 2007 (EDT) − − ==Thanks== − and my talk page. Your support is appreciated. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 00:14, 1 June 2007 (EDT) − − :You're welcome. ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 06:35, 1 June 2007 (EDT) − − == Why South Africa Sucks == − − Thank you [[User:Sevenstring|Sevenstring]] 20:37, 1 June 2007 (EDT) − − :You're welcome. ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 20:42, 1 June 2007 (EDT) − − == Article creation drive == − − − − [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:16, 2 June 2007 (EDT)conservative − − :That's excellent! I'll try to fill in some of them as I have time. ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 16:32, 2 June 2007 (EDT) − − ==Molecular Biology== − I noticed many articles popping up dealing with Molecular Biology, Molecular Genetics and Genetics. I saw that many of them are pretty short and are not specific enough to show the finer differences between certain topics. By chance are you using a text book for the article creation or recounting information you may have learned in a Biology class? I was waiting for a consensus on what age group we are supposedly writing for. Ed redirected my Gene Expression article because it was difficult for him to understand. It was written at an AP biology level taught in the US. I wanted clarification before editing any more articles and having several hours of work tossed because someone who has not been in a biology class in the past 5 years could not understand the terminology. If you are interested in having someone flesh out the articles let me know.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 10:46, 5 June 2007 (EDT) − − :I just looked at your version of the article on Gene expression. I think it is completely in line with the age level guideline (stated [[Conservapedia:Article level|here]]). The topic of Gene expression is quite advanced, and so the article should explain the topic as simply as possible, and then expound upon it in the body of the article. The first paragraph was easy for me to understand, and I think it should be understandable to any high school student who has taken biology. Please feel free to restore your version of the article. Any improvements you wish to make to other articles are welcome. Thanks, ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 11:48, 5 June 2007 (EDT) − − ==Template== − − Thanks a lot for telling me how to make a template...it wasn't at all confusing! [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 21:26, 6 June 2007 (EDT) − − :You're welcome. BTW, the Senate terms you are working on are excellent. ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 21:28, 6 June 2007 (EDT) − − == attilla the hun article == − − I saw your [[Attila the Hun]] material. You added a lot of material to the article which was excellent. However, if we are to effectively compete with Wikipedia which has a fairly big headstart we are going to have to footnote our material. And it is a Conservapedia rule that you must source your material. I know you do a lot for Conservapedia and so I hope you take this suggestion as the friendly note it is. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:46, 7 June 2007 (EDT) − − :Thank you for the tip. I will try to be more diligent about my footnotes in the future. Thanks, ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 07:05, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
Replacing page with 'F U C K YOU B I T C H'
F U C K YOU B I T C H
I created something new on the main page: [[Conservapedia:Articles That Need To Created]]