| Line 1,101: |
Line 1,101: |
| | |2022 | | |2022 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |This sequel to the more conservative 1993 film ''Hocus Pocus'' takes place 29 years after the original movie. It of course stars leftist actress Bette Middler (who also played Winifred from the first movie), and it features rants against the "patriarchy". In spite of the Sanderson Sisters clearly meant to be evil child-murderers unrepentant of their crime, the movie tries to make them redeemable, thus showing [[moral relativism]]. | + | |This sequel to the great conservative 1993 film ''Hocus Pocus'' takes place 29 years after the original movie. It of course stars leftist actress Bette Middler (who also played Winifred from the first movie), and it features rants against the "patriarchy". In spite of the Sanderson Sisters clearly meant to be evil child-murderers unrepentant of their crime, the movie tries to make them redeemable, thus showing [[moral relativism]]. |
| | |N/A | | |N/A |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,149: |
Line 1,149: |
| | |2009 | | |2009 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This film starring [[Megan Fox]] and [[Amanda Seyfried]] promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], and contains a lesbian kiss and them making out. It was a victim of Liberal false advertising that promised audiences it would be anti feminist. Even Chris Pratt, who had a minor role as a police officer couldn’t save the film. It gained a cult following among Liberals and those who believe in the homosexual agenda. | + | |This film starring [[Megan Fox]] and [[Amanda Seyfried]] promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], and contains a lesbian kiss and them making out. It was a victim of Liberal false advertising that promised audiences it would be anti feminist. Even [[Chris Pratt]], who had a minor role as a police officer couldn’t save the film. It gained a cult following among Liberals and those who believe in the homosexual agenda. |
| | |$16,204,793. | | |$16,204,793. |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,187: |
Line 1,187: |
| | |Don't let the patriotic-sounding title ("Red, White, and Blonde") fool you. It is significantly more left-wing, including promotion of animal rights (the main court case involved condemning animal testing) and also included a homosexual joke involving Elle Woods' pet chihuahua (despite the original film implying that said dog, who was male, was infatuated by the Taco Bell chihuahua mascot, a female). | | |Don't let the patriotic-sounding title ("Red, White, and Blonde") fool you. It is significantly more left-wing, including promotion of animal rights (the main court case involved condemning animal testing) and also included a homosexual joke involving Elle Woods' pet chihuahua (despite the original film implying that said dog, who was male, was infatuated by the Taco Bell chihuahua mascot, a female). |
| | |$124.9 million | | |$124.9 million |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |''The Lost World: Jurassic Park''
| |
| − | |1997
| |
| − | |PG-13
| |
| − | |The film is pro-environmentalist, and features John Hammond, the original head of Jurassic Park, hiring environmentalist hippies to sabotage his own company in the name of releasing the dinosaurs back into the wild, with the protagonists being depicted as being in the right despite causing explicit destruction and death via their actions, as well as demonizing the corporation for trying to stop them. Also has an anti-hunting message due to one of the main antagonists explicitly being a hunter; adding to that is one of the "heroes" removing bullets from the hunter's gun, putting everyone in even more danger from the dinosaurs, though no one calls him out for it. It is to be noted that such a message not only was not present in the book it was adapted from, but it if anything was the complete antithesis to the anti-cloning message from both the original book by Michael Crichton and the 1993 film that adapted it and that ''Lost World'' acted as a sequel to.
| |
| − | |$618.6 million
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Léon: The Professional'' | | |''Léon: The Professional'' |
| Line 1,211: |
Line 1,205: |
| | |The sequel now has a pro-illegal immigration message. | | |The sequel now has a pro-illegal immigration message. |
| | |$130,444,603 | | |$130,444,603 |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''The Lost World: Jurassic Park'' |
| | + | |1997 |
| | + | |PG-13 |
| | + | |The film is pro-environmentalist, and features John Hammond, the original head of Jurassic Park, hiring environmentalist hippies to sabotage his own company in the name of releasing the dinosaurs back into the wild, with the protagonists being depicted as being in the right despite causing explicit destruction and death via their actions, as well as demonizing the corporation for trying to stop them. Also has an anti-hunting message due to one of the main antagonists explicitly being a hunter; adding to that is one of the "heroes" removing bullets from the hunter's gun, putting everyone in even more danger from the dinosaurs, though no one calls him out for it. It is to be noted that such a message not only was not present in the book it was adapted from, but it if anything was the complete antithesis to the anti-cloning message from both the original book by Michael Crichton and the 1993 film that adapted it and that ''Lost World'' acted as a sequel to. |
| | + | |$618.6 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Machete'' | | |''Machete'' |
| Line 1,370: |
Line 1,370: |
| | |2020 | | |2020 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |Based off of a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their "backwards" ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also wrongly ragged against, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unempathetic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and unprogressive while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town are seen as in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana. | + | |Based off of a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their "backwards" ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also wrongly ragged against, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unemphatic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and non-progressive while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town are seen as in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,376: |
Line 1,376: |
| | |1995 | | |1995 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |A feminist western. | + | |A feminist revisionist western. |
| | |$18,636,537 | | |$18,636,537 |
| | |- | | |- |