nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 84:
Line 84: + + + + + +
no edit summary
:I'd like some guidance on an opening paragraph to explain the origin of New Ordeal. Could you provide an example maybe?[[User:PaulP|PaulP]] 00:13, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
:I'd like some guidance on an opening paragraph to explain the origin of New Ordeal. Could you provide an example maybe?[[User:PaulP|PaulP]] 00:13, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
::I thought it was quite obvious and to the point. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:33, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
::I thought it was quite obvious and to the point. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:33, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
This article's discussion page is locked. It is a somewhat bizarre article. I would humbly ask that if it is stay as a mainspace (non-essay) article, the primary author should, in one or two short sentences, explain the thesis of his piece. As it is, I have no idea what it is about. I certainly don't like the implication that right-wing extremist groups are Christian, but I'm sure I must be misreading that. Thanks.[[User:PaulP|PaulP]] 23:07, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
:See the souricing on it. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:03, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
:Thank you for responding. I did look at the article, the discussion, and the sources, but nothing pointed to a known usage of "New Ordeal". This make me think perhaps it was a creative, clever coinage of yours or of someone you know. It did go thru the citations in great detail. Perhaps this could be explained? [[User:PaulP|PaulP]] 00:07, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
::Frankly you have me confused; are you sure you have the right discussion page? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:54, 12 June 2007 (EDT)