Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:     
This article is far too sympathetic toward the Confederacy for my tastes.  This was a group who were acting '''in rebellion''' against the government of the United States.  They were exemplifying the definition of treason as found in the U.S. Constitution, namely "...waging war against [the United States]"  I feel like the article should make more mention of the whole "treason" and "rebellion" aspect of things but any such edits I make will most likely be removed.--[[User:Patthew|Patthew]] 22:32, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
This article is far too sympathetic toward the Confederacy for my tastes.  This was a group who were acting '''in rebellion''' against the government of the United States.  They were exemplifying the definition of treason as found in the U.S. Constitution, namely "...waging war against [the United States]"  I feel like the article should make more mention of the whole "treason" and "rebellion" aspect of things but any such edits I make will most likely be removed.--[[User:Patthew|Patthew]] 22:32, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
:No, I agree with you.  The article does needs balance.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:31, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,438

edits

Navigation menu