| Line 136: |
Line 136: |
| | | | |
| | ===Benghazi massacre=== | | ===Benghazi massacre=== |
| | + | [[File:Benghazi attack.jpg|left|300px|thumb|Amb. Stevens was specifically in Benghazi to oversee and facilitate transfer of captured weapons from the Gadaffi regime to groups in Syria which ultimately became the [[Islamic State]]. Few people had knowledge of this program beyond Stevens, Clinton, and Obama. Once the mission was completed, Stevens was expendable.<ref>https://www.amazon.com/REAL-Benghazi-Story-White-Hillary/dp/1531817130</ref>]] |
| | {{See also|Benghazi massacre}} | | {{See also|Benghazi massacre}} |
| − | [[File:Benghazi attack.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Amb. Stevens was specifically in Benghazi to oversee and facilitate transfer of captured weapons from the Gadaffi regime to groups in Syria which ultimately became the [[Islamic State]]. Few people had knowledge of this program beyond Stevens, Clinton, and Obama. Once the mission was completed, Stevens was expendable.<ref>https://www.amazon.com/REAL-Benghazi-Story-White-Hillary/dp/1531817130</ref>]]
| |
| | Nuland was involved in misleading the American people about the Benghazi massacre terrorist attack on September 11, 2012, two months before the [[2012 presidential election]]. Glenn Kessler of the ''[[Washington Post]]'' reported:<ref>https://archive.is/GLwBk#selection-4057.134-4077.198</ref> | | Nuland was involved in misleading the American people about the Benghazi massacre terrorist attack on September 11, 2012, two months before the [[2012 presidential election]]. Glenn Kessler of the ''[[Washington Post]]'' reported:<ref>https://archive.is/GLwBk#selection-4057.134-4077.198</ref> |
| | {{quotebox-float|Let’s look at the version as of 5:09 p.m. on Sept 14, a Friday, and see the red flags for State: | | {{quotebox-float|Let’s look at the version as of 5:09 p.m. on Sept 14, a Friday, and see the red flags for State: |
| Line 145: |
Line 145: |
| | The clear implication is that State screwed up, even though internally, it was known that this was a CIA operation. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland especially objects to the reference to previous warnings, saying it “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings.” | | The clear implication is that State screwed up, even though internally, it was known that this was a CIA operation. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland especially objects to the reference to previous warnings, saying it “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings.” |
| | Moreover, Nuland had been constrained from saying much about the attack at her daily press briefings, so she was unsure why the agency would suddenly give so much information to members of Congress.}} | | Moreover, Nuland had been constrained from saying much about the attack at her daily press briefings, so she was unsure why the agency would suddenly give so much information to members of Congress.}} |
| | + | {{clear}} |
| | | | |
| | ===Arms smuggling to ISIS=== | | ===Arms smuggling to ISIS=== |