Changes

While Democratic campaigns and groups navigate the patchwork of state rules governing mail ballots to encourage turnout, Democratic election attorney Marc Elias is trying to change many of those rules.

While Democratic campaigns and groups navigate the patchwork of state rules governing mail ballots to encourage turnout, Democratic election attorney Marc Elias is trying to change many of those rules.

[[File:Ballot harvesting.jpeg|left|300px|thumb|]]

[[File:Ballot harvesting.jpeg|left|300px|thumb]]

This is the other half of the party’s vote-by-mail efforts: a sprawling legal effort that spans every battleground state and is costing tens of millions of dollars. Priorities USA, just one of Elias’ clients, has expanded its voting litigation budget to $32 million.

This is the other half of the party’s vote-by-mail efforts: a sprawling legal effort that spans every battleground state and is costing tens of millions of dollars. Priorities USA, just one of Elias’ clients, has expanded its voting litigation budget to $32 million.

Smartmatic was officially incorporated on 11 April 11. 2000 in [[Delaware]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Division of Corporations - Filing - SMARTMATIC CORPORATION|url=https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx|website=State of Delaware - Division of Corporations|publisher=State of Delaware|accessdate=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Foreign Profit - SMARTMATIC CORPORATION|url=http://www.urru.org/papers/anexo1.2.jpg|publisher=State of Delaware|accessdate=}}</ref><ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/20/business/a-crucial-vote-for-venezuela-and-a-company.html?_r=1 "A Crucial Vote for Venezuela and a Company"] ''New York Times''. Retrieved 2017-01-19.</ref>  After receiving funds from private investors, the company then began to expand.  Smartmatic was the main technology supplier for fourteen Venezuelan national elections. In March 2018, Smartmatic ceased operations in Venezuela.<ref name=":11">{{cite news|title=Smartmatic Announces Cease of Operations in Venezuela|url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180306005537/en/Smartmatic-Announces-Cease-Operations-Venezuela|accessdate=|work=Business Wire|date=6 March 2018|language=en}}</ref>

Smartmatic was officially incorporated on 11 April 11. 2000 in [[Delaware]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Division of Corporations - Filing - SMARTMATIC CORPORATION|url=https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx|website=State of Delaware - Division of Corporations|publisher=State of Delaware|accessdate=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Foreign Profit - SMARTMATIC CORPORATION|url=http://www.urru.org/papers/anexo1.2.jpg|publisher=State of Delaware|accessdate=}}</ref><ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/20/business/a-crucial-vote-for-venezuela-and-a-company.html?_r=1 "A Crucial Vote for Venezuela and a Company"] ''New York Times''. Retrieved 2017-01-19.</ref>  After receiving funds from private investors, the company then began to expand.  Smartmatic was the main technology supplier for fourteen Venezuelan national elections. In March 2018, Smartmatic ceased operations in Venezuela.<ref name=":11">{{cite news|title=Smartmatic Announces Cease of Operations in Venezuela|url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180306005537/en/Smartmatic-Announces-Cease-Operations-Venezuela|accessdate=|work=Business Wire|date=6 March 2018|language=en}}</ref>

Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems in 2005.<ref name="WPbizz">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/30/AR2006103001224.html|title=Voting Machine Firm Denies Chavez Ties|last1=Goldfarb|first1=Zachary A.|date=31 October 2006|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=|quote=Bizta, a start-up technology company in Venezuela with some of the same owners as Smartmatic}}</ref><ref>''Business Wire'', 9 March 2005, [http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20050308006237&newsLang=en Sequoia Voting Systems and Smartmatic Combine to Form Global Leader in Electronic Voting Solutions]</ref><ref name="CRONsmart">{{cite news|url=http://www.cronica.com.mx/notas/2009/472673.html|title=Smartmatic es una empresa de "comercio riesgoso" y... defraudadora|last1=Cedillo Cano|first1=Alejandro|date=1 December 2009|work=La Crónica de Hoy|accessdate=|language=es-MX}}</ref> Following this acquisition, Rep. [[Carolyn Maloney]] requested an investigation to determine whether the [[Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States|Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)]] had followed correct processes to green-light sale of Sequoia to Smartmatic, which was described as having "possible ties to the Venezuelan government".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://maloney.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1095&Itemid=61|title=Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney|website=Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney|accessdate=2 January 2018}}</ref> The request was made after a March 2006 following issues in [[Chicago]] and Cook County, where a percentage of the machines involved were manufactured by Sequoia, and Sequoia provided technical assistance, some by a number of Venezuelan nationals flown in for the event.<ref name="abclocal">ABC Local, 7 April 2006, [http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=4065162 Alderman: Election Day troubles could be part of 'international conspiracy']</ref>  A [[WikiLeaks]] cable from July 10, 2006 discussed ownership:

Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems in 2005.<ref name="WPbizz">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/30/AR2006103001224.html|title=Voting Machine Firm Denies Chavez Ties|last1=Goldfarb|first1=Zachary A.|date=31 October 2006|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=|quote=Bizta, a start-up technology company in Venezuela with some of the same owners as Smartmatic}}</ref><ref>''Business Wire'', 9 March 2005, [http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20050308006237&newsLang=en Sequoia Voting Systems and Smartmatic Combine to Form Global Leader in Electronic Voting Solutions]</ref><ref name="CRONsmart">{{cite news|url=http://www.cronica.com.mx/notas/2009/472673.html|title=Smartmatic es una empresa de "comercio riesgoso" y... defraudadora|last1=Cedillo Cano|first1=Alejandro|date=1 December 2009|work=La Crónica de Hoy|accessdate=|language=es-MX}}</ref> Following this acquisition, Rep. [[Carolyn Maloney]] requested an investigation to determine whether the [[Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States|Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)]] had followed correct processes to green-light sale of Sequoia to Smartmatic, which was described as having "possible ties to the Venezuelan government".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://maloney.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1095&Itemid=61|title=Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney|website=Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney|accessdate=2 January 2018}}</ref> The request was made after a March 2006 following issues in [[Chicago]] and Cook County, where a percentage of the machines involved were manufactured by Sequoia, and Sequoia provided technical assistance, some by a number of Venezuelan nationals flown in for the event.<ref name="abclocal">ABC Local, 7 April 2006, [http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=4065162 Alderman: Election Day troubles could be part of 'international conspiracy']</ref>  A [[WikiLeaks]] cable from July 10, 2006, discussed ownership:

{{quotebox-float|“The Venezuelan-owned Smartmatic Corporation is a riddle both in ownership and operation, complicated by the fact that its machines have overseen several landslide (and contested) victories by President Hugo Chavez and his supporters.  The electronic voting company went from a small technology startup to a market player in just a few years, catapulted by its participation in the August 2004 recall referendum.  Smartmatic has claimed to be of U.S. origin, but its true owners — probably elite Venezuelans of several political strains — remain hidden behind a web of holding companies in the [[Netherlands]] and [[Barbados]].  The Smartmatic machines used in Venezuela are widely suspected of, though never proven conclusively to be, susceptible to fraud.  The company is thought to be backing out of Venezuelan electoral events, focusing now on other parts of world, including the United States via its subsidiary, Sequoia.”<ref>https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06CARACAS2063_a.html</ref>}}

{{quotebox-float|“The Venezuelan-owned Smartmatic Corporation is a riddle both in ownership and operation, complicated by the fact that its machines have overseen several landslide (and contested) victories by President Hugo Chavez and his supporters.  The electronic voting company went from a small technology startup to a market player in just a few years, catapulted by its participation in the August 2004 recall referendum.  Smartmatic has claimed to be of U.S. origin, but its true owners — probably elite Venezuelans of several political strains — remain hidden behind a web of holding companies in the [[Netherlands]] and [[Barbados]].  The Smartmatic machines used in Venezuela are widely suspected of, though never proven conclusively to be, susceptible to fraud.  The company is thought to be backing out of Venezuelan electoral events, focusing now on other parts of world, including the United States via its subsidiary, Sequoia.”<ref>https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06CARACAS2063_a.html</ref>}}

Following the request, Smartmatic and Sequoia submitted a request to be reviewed by the CFIUS while also denying links to the Venezuelan government.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newsmax.com/pre-2008/voting-machine-firm-denies-hugo/2006/10/30/id/684637/|title=Voting-Machine Firm Denies Hugo Chavez Ties|date=2006-10-30|website=[[Newsmax]]|access-date=2019-08-30}}</ref> The company disclosed that it was owned by Antonio Mugica (78.8%), Alfredo Anzola (3.87%), Roger Pinate (8.47%), Jorge Massa Dustou (5.97%) and employees (2.89%).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.govtech.com/security/Voting-Machine-Company-Vows-No-Connection.html|title=Voting Machine Company Vows No Connection to Venezuelan President Chavez|website=www.govtech.com|language=en|access-date=2019-08-30}}</ref> Smartmatic subsequently sold Sequoia and later withdrew from Cook County in December 2006.<ref name="WSJpe">{{cite news|title=Politics & Economics: Smartmatic to Shed U.S. Unit, End Probe Into Venezuelan Links|last1=Davis|first1=Bob|date=22 December 2006|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|publisher=Dow Jones & Company|ref=Page A6}}</ref>

Following the request, Smartmatic and Sequoia submitted a request to be reviewed by the CFIUS while also denying links to the Venezuelan government.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newsmax.com/pre-2008/voting-machine-firm-denies-hugo/2006/10/30/id/684637/|title=Voting-Machine Firm Denies Hugo Chavez Ties|date=2006-10-30|website=[[Newsmax]]|access-date=2019-08-30}}</ref> The company disclosed that it was owned by Antonio Mugica (78.8%), Alfredo Anzola (3.87%), Roger Pinate (8.47%), Jorge Massa Dustou (5.97%) and employees (2.89%).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.govtech.com/security/Voting-Machine-Company-Vows-No-Connection.html|title=Voting Machine Company Vows No Connection to Venezuelan President Chavez|website=www.govtech.com|language=en|access-date=2019-08-30}}</ref> Smartmatic subsequently sold Sequoia and later withdrew from Cook County in December 2006.<ref name="WSJpe">{{cite news|title=Politics & Economics: Smartmatic to Shed U.S. Unit, End Probe Into Venezuelan Links|last1=Davis|first1=Bob|date=22 December 2006|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|publisher=Dow Jones & Company|ref=Page A6}}</ref>

All Dominion machines include a “weighted race feature” to fractionalize votes whose only purpose is to cheat in elections.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/dominion-voting-machines-include-weighted-race-feature-whose-purpose-cheat-elections-contacted-dominion-not-get-response/</ref>  For example, the machine can be set to count a vote for Donald Trump as 0.7 of a vote while counting a vote for Joe Biden as 1.25 of a vote.<ref>https://youtu.be/7TLm0D9qvXA</ref>

All Dominion machines include a “weighted race feature” to fractionalize votes whose only purpose is to cheat in elections.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/dominion-voting-machines-include-weighted-race-feature-whose-purpose-cheat-elections-contacted-dominion-not-get-response/</ref>  For example, the machine can be set to count a vote for Donald Trump as 0.7 of a vote while counting a vote for Joe Biden as 1.25 of a vote.<ref>https://youtu.be/7TLm0D9qvXA</ref>

As of 2020, the equipment is used in 30 states in the [[United States]].  In the [[2020 Presidential election]], Dominion Voting Systems deleted 2.7 million votes for incumbent [[President Donald Trump]] nationwide. Data analysis found the voting systems switched 221,000 votes in [[Pennsylvania]] from President Trump to his rival, [[Democratic party|Democrat]] challenge former [[Vice President Joe Biden]]. 941,000 Trump votes for President Trump were deleted. Other states using Dominion switched 435,000 votes from President Trump to Joe Biden, although liberals like to dispute it despite lots of evidence proving it did. <ref>https://thenewamerican.com/potus-dominion-voting-system-deleted-2-7-million-trump-votes/</ref>  As suspicions arose Dominion shuttered their [[Toronto]] and [[Denver]] offices, refused to testify before a Pennsylvania House committee,<ref>https://www.theepochtimes.com/dominion-cancels-planned-appearance-before-pennsylvania-lawmakers_3587425.html</ref> and at least 100 Dominion employees deleted their LinkedIn profiles.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/since-election-day-100-243-dominion-employees-linkedin-deleted-profiles/</ref>     

As of 2020, the equipment is used in 30 states in the [[United States]].  In the [[2020 Presidential election]], Dominion Voting Systems deleted 2.7 million votes for incumbent [[President Donald Trump]] nationwide. Data analysis found the voting systems switched 221,000 votes in [[Pennsylvania]] from President Trump to his rival, [[Democratic party|Democrat]] challenge former [[Vice President Joe Biden]]. 941,000 Trump votes for President Trump were deleted. Other states using Dominion switched 435,000 votes from President Trump to Joe Biden, although liberals like to dispute it despite lots of evidence proving it did.<ref>https://thenewamerican.com/potus-dominion-voting-system-deleted-2-7-million-trump-votes/</ref>  As suspicions arose Dominion shuttered their [[Toronto]] and [[Denver]] offices, refused to testify before a Pennsylvania House committee,<ref>https://www.theepochtimes.com/dominion-cancels-planned-appearance-before-pennsylvania-lawmakers_3587425.html</ref> and at least 100 Dominion employees deleted their LinkedIn profiles.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/since-election-day-100-243-dominion-employees-linkedin-deleted-profiles/</ref>     

In 2016 Dominion Voting Systems Vice President of Engineering [[Eric Coomer]] was asked if it was possible to bypass election systems software and go directly to the data tables that manage systems running elections in [[Illinois]]. His response was, “Yes, if they have access.”<ref>https://www.thepostemail.com/2016/09/01/critical-flaws-in-election-security-confirmed-by-dominion-voting-executive/</ref>

In 2016 Dominion Voting Systems Vice President of Engineering [[Eric Coomer]] was asked if it was possible to bypass election systems software and go directly to the data tables that manage systems running elections in [[Illinois]]. His response was, “Yes, if they have access.”<ref>https://www.thepostemail.com/2016/09/01/critical-flaws-in-election-security-confirmed-by-dominion-voting-executive/</ref>

After the closing of polls in Pennsylvania and other swing states, the voting machines will be intercepted and then altered using complex [[algorithm]]s to alter the votes in a way that evades detection, handing a victory to the pre-designated “winner” (Joe Biden).  A covert app called “Scorecard” steals votes by making sure Democrats always stay about 3% ahead of their Republican rivals. “Scorecard steals the elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points,”  McInerney said.<ref>https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/11/red-alert-dems-collude-with-cia-to-launch-intelligence-operation-that-alters-voting-machine-results-in-pennsylvania-and-other-swing-states/</ref>

After the closing of polls in Pennsylvania and other swing states, the voting machines will be intercepted and then altered using complex [[algorithm]]s to alter the votes in a way that evades detection, handing a victory to the pre-designated “winner” (Joe Biden).  A covert app called “Scorecard” steals votes by making sure Democrats always stay about 3% ahead of their Republican rivals. “Scorecard steals the elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points,”  McInerney said.<ref>https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/11/red-alert-dems-collude-with-cia-to-launch-intelligence-operation-that-alters-voting-machine-results-in-pennsylvania-and-other-swing-states/</ref>

This explains why Joe Biden recently said, with great clarity, “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”  And why Biden told voters at a small rally that he didn’t “need their vote” to become President, and why [[Nancy Pelosi]] said Biden will win no matter what the votes say on November 3, 2020.

This explains why Joe Biden recently said, with great clarity, “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”  And why Biden told voters at a small rally that he didn't “need their vote” to become president, and why [[Nancy Pelosi]] said Biden will win no matter what the votes say on November 3, 2020.

This was confirmed by the documents released by [[Edward Snowden]].<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-infiltrates-links-to-yahoo-google-data-centers-worldwide-snowden-documents-say/2013/10/30/e51d661e-4166-11e3-8b74-d89d714ca4dd_story.html</ref>

This was confirmed by the documents released by [[Edward Snowden]].<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-infiltrates-links-to-yahoo-google-data-centers-worldwide-snowden-documents-say/2013/10/30/e51d661e-4166-11e3-8b74-d89d714ca4dd_story.html</ref>

At 2:30 AM EDT of the 4th of November 2020, TV broadcasts reported that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada and Georgia decided to cease vote counting operations and would continue the following day. This unanimous decision to initially and intentionally stop counting by all five battleground states was unprecedented, and it demonstrates prior coordination by election officials in battleground states.  This allowed for more time to manufacture fraudulent ballots.

At 2:30 AM EDT of the 4th of November 2020, TV broadcasts reported that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada and Georgia decided to cease vote counting operations and would continue the following day. This unanimous decision to initially and intentionally stop counting by all five battleground states was unprecedented, and it demonstrates prior coordination by election officials in battleground states.  This allowed for more time to manufacture fraudulent ballots.

One method to track fraudulent votes is to look closely at how many of the votes did little or no down-ticket voting.  When manufacturing votes, it is too time consuming to vote for other officeholders.  Statistical analysis showed wild numbers of people who voted only for Joe Biden and didn’t vote further down the ticket:<ref>https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1325193658170134531</ref>

One method to track fraudulent votes is to look closely at how many of the votes did little or no down-ticket voting.  When manufacturing votes, it is too time-consuming to vote for other officeholders.  Statistical analysis showed wild numbers of people who voted only for Joe Biden and didn't vote further down the ticket:<ref>https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1325193658170134531</ref>

*Pennsylvania — 98,000

*Pennsylvania — 98,000

*Georgia — 80-90,000

*Georgia — 80–90,000

*Arizona —  42,000

*Arizona —  42,000

*[[Michigan]] — 69-115,000

*[[Michigan]] — 69–115,000

*Wisconsin — 62,836

*Wisconsin — 62,836

A standard [[voter fraud]] method, [[Benford's Law]], flags these votes as suspect.<ref>https://thenationalpulse.com/politics/pennsylvania-vote-anomalies/</ref>

A standard [[voter fraud]] method, [[Benford's Law]], flags these votes as suspect.<ref>https://thenationalpulse.com/politics/pennsylvania-vote-anomalies/</ref>

{{quotebox-float|"Over half of Black men (52 percent) who identified as ideologically conservative cast their vote for the president, and 1 in 3 Black men living in the Midwest also voted for him....About 26 percent of Black men who had a high school diploma or less supported Trump. But 22 percent of Black men with bachelor’s degrees and 20 percent of Black men with advanced degrees also supported him.<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/black-men-drifted-democrats-toward-trump-record-numbers-polls-show-n1246447</ref>}}

{{quotebox-float|"Over half of Black men (52 percent) who identified as ideologically conservative cast their vote for the president, and 1 in 3 Black men living in the Midwest also voted for him....About 26 percent of Black men who had a high school diploma or less supported Trump. But 22 percent of Black men with bachelor’s degrees and 20 percent of Black men with advanced degrees also supported him.<ref>https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/black-men-drifted-democrats-toward-trump-record-numbers-polls-show-n1246447</ref>}}

[[File:Fuzzy_Match_2016.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Fuzzy matching accounts for 1.8 million increase in turnout.]]

[[File:Fuzzy_Match_2016.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Fuzzy matching accounts for 1.8 million increase in turnout.]]

Democratic support in the densest urban areas peaked in 2016 and 2018 at 75%, and fell to 72% in 2020.<ref>https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334</ref> <ref>https://archive.is/x2jsh</ref>  An analysis of the 2020 election by Richard Florida and Patrick Adler of the University of Toronto showed that Republicans continued to capture many more metropolitan areas, while the Democratic vote is concentrated in a smaller number of denser, coastal metros and college towns.  Overall, Biden won considerably fewer metros than Trump, taking 41% of metropolitan areas, to 59% for Trump.<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-12-04/how-metro-areas-voted-in-the-2020-election</ref>

Democratic support in the densest urban areas peaked in 2016 and 2018 at 75%, and fell to 72% in 2020.<ref>https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334</ref><ref>https://archive.is/x2jsh</ref>  An analysis of the 2020 election by Richard Florida and Patrick Adler of the University of Toronto showed that Republicans continued to capture many more metropolitan areas, while the Democratic vote is concentrated in a smaller number of denser, coastal metros and college towns.  Overall, Biden won considerably fewer metros than Trump, taking 41% of metropolitan areas, to 59% for Trump.<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-12-04/how-metro-areas-voted-in-the-2020-election</ref>

Latino voting levels allegedly rose dramatically in 2020, with the number of Latino votes rising by more than 30% compared to 2016. Leftist election analysts found an 8 point drop in overall partisan support levels, going from 71% Democratic support in 2016, to 63% in 2020.  The biggest drop in support for Democrats came in [[Cuba]]n areas (13 points). [[Mexican]]s are the largest Latino subgroup in most states across the country, and highly Mexican areas also showed a drop (6 points), albeit smaller than Cuban areas. [[Puerto Rican]], [[Dominican Republic]], and areas with other dominant groups were in the middle (8-9 point drop), close to the national average.

Latino voting levels allegedly rose dramatically in 2020, with the number of Latino votes rising by more than 30% compared to 2016. Leftist election analysts found an 8-point drop in overall partisan support levels, going from 71% Democratic support in 2016, to 63% in 2020.  The biggest drop in support for Democrats came in [[Cuba]]n areas (13 points). [[Mexican]]s are the largest Latino subgroup in most states across the country, and highly Mexican areas also showed a drop (6 points), albeit smaller than Cuban areas. [[Puerto Rican]], [[Dominican Republic]], and areas with other dominant groups were in the middle (8-9 point drop), close to the national average.

Overall, 22% of Latino voters were allegedly first-time voters according to leftist election analysts.  By contrast, just 14% of the national electorate was entirely new.  A full 40% of Latino voters were allegedly new presidential voters, while the national number is 29% of the overall electorate.

Overall, 22% of Latino voters were allegedly first-time voters according to leftist election analysts.  By contrast, just 14% of the national electorate was entirely new.  A full 40% of Latino voters were allegedly new presidential voters, while the national number is 29% of the overall electorate.

One important question that immediately follows this line of thinking is, how Democratic or Republican-leaning are these new voters, compared to returning voters? We have suggestive data to try to answer this question, but we want to strongly caution readers that we consider these results highly tentative.  

One important question that immediately follows this line of thinking is, how Democratic or Republican-leaning are these new voters, compared to returning voters? We have suggestive data to try to answer this question, but we want to strongly caution readers that we consider these results highly tentative.  

According to our tentative estimates, new presidential voters supported Biden at substantially higher rates overall (56%) than 2016 voters who returned in 2020 (51%). This appears to be driven primarily by their demographic distribution. Consider the age breakdown shown above: there are few differences between 2016 voters and new presidential voters within each age group, but new voters skew much younger and more Democratic. On top of this, new voters were more racially diverse than returning 2016 voters, with 40% of Latino voters, and 42% of Asian voters being new presidential voters.<ref> https://catalist.us/wh-national/#pp-toc-608eee40d2225-anchor-5</ref>}}

According to our tentative estimates, new presidential voters supported Biden at substantially higher rates overall (56%) than 2016 voters who returned in 2020 (51%). This appears to be driven primarily by their demographic distribution. Consider the age breakdown shown above: there are few differences between 2016 voters and new presidential voters within each age group, but new voters skew much younger and more Democratic. On top of this, new voters were more racially diverse than returning 2016 voters, with 40% of Latino voters, and 42% of Asian voters being new presidential voters.<ref>https://catalist.us/wh-national/#pp-toc-608eee40d2225-anchor-5</ref>}}

===Pennsylvania===

===Pennsylvania===

[[File:Pennsylvania-740x740.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Vote switching.]]

[[File:Pennsylvania-740x740.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Vote switching.]]

[[Democrat]] operative [[Kathy Boockvar]], who simultaneously was serving as Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth in charge of elections, told the [[United States Supreme Court]] on October 28, 2020 that ballots received after 8 p.m. on November 3, 2020 would be segregated, but she changed the rules on November 1 and directed counties to canvass those ballots as soon as possible upon receipt. In some counties, it is not possible to both segregate and canvass ballots as directed. This directive leaves open the possibility that timely votes will be commingled with votes received after 8 p.m. on Election Day, despite the fact that these votes remain the subject of litigation before the United States Supreme Court.

[[Democrat]] operative [[Kathy Boockvar]], who simultaneously was serving as Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth in charge of elections, told the [[United States Supreme Court]] on October 28, 2020, that ballots received after 8 p.m. on November 3, 2020, would be segregated, but she changed the rules on November 1 and directed counties to canvass those ballots as soon as possible upon receipt. In some counties, it is not possible to both segregate and canvass ballots as directed. This directive leaves open the possibility that timely votes will be commingled with votes received after 8 p.m. on Election Day, despite the fact that these votes remain the subject of litigation before the United States Supreme Court.

The Department changed the rules again on November 2, 2020 when they provided last-second guidance directing counties to provide information to help voters whose mail-in or absentee ballots were incorrectly completed so those voters could vote on a provisional ballot. The late release of this “guidance” resulted in inconsistent application across the counties – some of whom contacted voters as directed and some who did not. There is no basis for this guidance in current law. The Secretary created this new process out of thin air.

The department changed the rules again on November 2, 2020, when they provided last-second guidance directing counties to provide information to help voters whose mail-in or absentee ballots were incorrectly completed so those voters could vote on a provisional ballot. The late release of this “guidance” resulted in inconsistent application across the counties – some of whom contacted voters as directed and some who did not. There is no basis for this guidance in current law. The Secretary created this new process out of thin air.

At 8:38 p.m. on Monday, November 2 – less than 12 hours before the polls were to open – the Department issued an email to counties directing them to provide information to political party and candidate representatives regarding mail-in and absentee ballots which had been set aside because they failed to comply with the requirements of the Election Code in order to be counted, so that voters could come in and vote provisionally at the polls. The late release of this “guidance” resulted in inconsistent application across the counties, some of whom contacted voters as directed and some who did not; such differential treatment is wholly inappropriate and a direct result of Boockvar’s scattershot approach to [[Pennsylvania]]’s elections.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/04/pennsylvania-republican-senators-call-on-pa-secretary-of-state-to-resign/</ref><ref>https://www.bitchute.com/video/xUWA4CqzQ6pN/</ref>

At 8:38p.m. on Monday, November 2 – less than 12 hours before the polls were to open – the department issued an email to counties directing them to provide information to political party and candidate representatives regarding mail-in and absentee ballots which had been set aside because they failed to comply with the requirements of the Election Code in order to be counted, so that voters could come in and vote provisionally at the polls. The late release of this “guidance” resulted in inconsistent application across the counties, some of whom contacted voters as directed and some who did not; such differential treatment is wholly inappropriate and a direct result of Boockvar's scattershot approach to [[Pennsylvania]]’s elections.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/04/pennsylvania-republican-senators-call-on-pa-secretary-of-state-to-resign/</ref><ref>https://www.bitchute.com/video/xUWA4CqzQ6pN/</ref>

The Pennsylvania Appeals Court issued an order that said  

The Pennsylvania Appeals Court issued an order that said  

[[Philadelphia]] Democrat election officials refused to comply with the order,<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/03/the-steal-is-on-in-pennsylvania-poll-watchers-denied-access-illegal-campaigning-at-polling-locations/</ref><ref>https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gop-poll-watchers-are-denied-access-in-philadelphia</ref>  and the Democrat [[Sheriff]], a Biden supporter, refused to enforce the Appeals Court order.<ref>https://nationalfile.com/what-are-you-hiding-trump-campaign-says-philly-sheriff-wont-enforce-order-allowing-gop-observers/</ref>

[[Philadelphia]] Democrat election officials refused to comply with the order,<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/03/the-steal-is-on-in-pennsylvania-poll-watchers-denied-access-illegal-campaigning-at-polling-locations/</ref><ref>https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gop-poll-watchers-are-denied-access-in-philadelphia</ref>  and the Democrat [[Sheriff]], a Biden supporter, refused to enforce the Appeals Court order.<ref>https://nationalfile.com/what-are-you-hiding-trump-campaign-says-philly-sheriff-wont-enforce-order-allowing-gop-observers/</ref>

The Trump campaign then filed a lawsuit in [[federal]] district court claiming that the Board of Elections is “nonetheless continuing to count ballots, without any observations by any representatives or poll watchers of President Trump and the Republican Party.”<ref>https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7325351/11-5-20-Trump-Campaign-v-Philadelphia-Board-of.pdf</ref>  The lawsuit claims that Trump campaign observers were denied access altogether in some instances in Philadelphia County. The county’s elections board did not permit the Trump campaign’s observers to be within 6 feet of “all aspects” of the pre-canvassing process in violation of Commonwealth Court Judge Christine Fizzano Cannon’s November 5, 2020, order requiring that poll-watchers “be permitted to observe all aspects of the canvassing process within 6 feet.”  The lawsuit states,

The Trump campaign then filed a lawsuit in [[federal]] district court claiming that the Board of Elections is “nonetheless continuing to count ballots, without any observations by any representatives or poll watchers of President Trump and the Republican Party.”<ref>https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7325351/11-5-20-Trump-Campaign-v-Philadelphia-Board-of.pdf</ref>  The lawsuit claims that Trump campaign observers were denied access altogether in some instances in Philadelphia County. The county's elections board did not permit the Trump campaign's observers to be within 6 feet of “all aspects” of the pre-canvassing process in violation of Commonwealth Court Judge Christine Fizzano Cannon's November 5, 2020, order requiring that poll-watchers “be permitted to observe all aspects of the canvassing process within 6 feet.”  The lawsuit states,

{{quotebox-float|“It is estimated that 680,770 ballots were processed by the Allegheny and Philadelphia County Boards of Elections when no observation was allowed.”}}

{{quotebox-float|“It is estimated that 680,770 ballots were processed by the Allegheny and Philadelphia County Boards of Elections when no observation was allowed.”}}

115% of Pensylvania registered Democrats voted for Biden.  Biden received 1.24 to 1.43 times greater than either [[Hillary Clinton]] or [[Barack Obama]] in predominant Republican counties.<ref>https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1325193658170134531</ref>

115% of Pennsylvania registered Democrats voted for Biden.  Biden received 1.24 to 1.43 times greater than either [[Hillary Clinton]] or [[Barack Obama]] in predominant Republican counties.<ref>https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1325193658170134531</ref>

Another way to track fraudulent votes is to look closely at how many of the votes did little or no down-ticket voting.  When manufacturing votes, it is too time consuming to vote for other officeholders.<ref>https://thenationalpulse.com/politics/pennsylvania-vote-anomalies/</ref>

Another way to track fraudulent votes is to look closely at how many of the votes did little or no down-ticket voting.  When manufacturing votes, it is too time-consuming to vote for other officeholders.<ref>https://thenationalpulse.com/politics/pennsylvania-vote-anomalies/</ref>

===Michigan===

===Michigan===

[[File:2020-11-04.jpg|right|300px|thumb|]]

[[File:2020-11-04.jpg|right|300px|thumb]]

In a lawsuit against the Detroit Election Commission following the [[2020 presidential election]], election observers alleged:<ref>https://greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Complaint-Costantino-FINAL-With-Exhibits.pdf</ref>

In a lawsuit against the Detroit Election Commission following the [[2020 presidential election]], election observers alleged:<ref>https://greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Complaint-Costantino-FINAL-With-Exhibits.pdf</ref>

{{quotebox|a.Defendants systematically processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the  Qualified  Voter  File  (QVF)  or in the supplemental sheets. When a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted.

{{quotebox|a.Defendants systematically processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the  Qualified  Voter  File  (QVF)  or in the supplemental sheets. When a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted.

e.Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.  

e.Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.  

f.On  a  daily basis leading up to the election,  [[City of Detroit]] election workers and  4 Great Lakes Justice Center employees coached voters to vote for  Joe  Biden and the  Democrat party.  These workers and employees encouraged voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. These election workers and employees went over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.  

f.On  a  daily basis leading up to the election,  [[City of Detroit]] election workers and  4 Great Lakes Justice Center employees coached voters to vote for  Joe  Biden and the  Democrat party.  These workers and employees encouraged voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. These election workers and employees went over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.  

g.Unsecured ballots arrived at the  TCF  Center loading garage,  not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.

g.Unsecured ballots arrived at the  TCF  Center loading garage,  not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.

104,984 Stolen Votes in GA.<ref>https://centralcitynews.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Central-City-News-11-19-20-Small.pdf</ref>]]

104,984 Stolen Votes in GA.<ref>https://centralcitynews.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Central-City-News-11-19-20-Small.pdf</ref>]]

:{{See also|Georgia election fraud}}

:{{See also|Georgia election fraud}}

On March 6, 2020 the [[Georgia]] Secretary of State, [[Brad Raffensperger]], signed off on a secret legal agreement with the [[Democratic Party]] of Georgia, the [[Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee]], and the [[Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee]] to alter [[absentee ballot]] procedures in Georgia.<ref>https://www.dropbox.com/s/ta0rze1m3flzk5o/2020-11-13%20Complaint%20-%20L.%20Wood%20v.%20Raffensperger%20et%20al.pdf?dl=0</ref> The Democrats’ attorney for this secret deal was [[Marc Elias]] from [[Perkins Coie]],<ref>https://www.indiarightnownews.com/lin-wood-files-lawsuit-challenging-georgias-secretary-of-states-dark-unconstitutional-agreement-with-hillary-attorney-marc-elias/</ref> the bagman for [[Hillary Clinton]] who hire [[FusionGPS]] to write the ''[[Steele dossier]]'' during the [[2016 presidential election]].

On March 6, 2020, the [[Georgia]] Secretary of State, [[Brad Raffensperger]], signed off on a secret legal agreement with the [[Democratic Party]] of Georgia, the [[Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee]], and the [[Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee]] to alter [[absentee ballot]] procedures in Georgia.<ref>https://www.dropbox.com/s/ta0rze1m3flzk5o/2020-11-13%20Complaint%20-%20L.%20Wood%20v.%20Raffensperger%20et%20al.pdf?dl=0</ref> The Democrats’ attorney for this secret deal was [[Marc Elias]] from [[Perkins Coie]],<ref>https://www.indiarightnownews.com/lin-wood-files-lawsuit-challenging-georgias-secretary-of-states-dark-unconstitutional-agreement-with-hillary-attorney-marc-elias/</ref> the bagman for [[Hillary Clinton]] who hire [[FusionGPS]] to write the ''[[Steele dossier]]'' during the [[2016 presidential election]].

Raffensperger announced the state’s purchase of a $106 million election system from Dominion Voting Systems in July 2019. In a lawsuit, which originated in 2017, critics contend that the new system was subject to many of the same security vulnerabilities as the one it was replacing.

Raffensperger announced the state's purchase of a $106 million election system from Dominion Voting Systems in July 2019. In a lawsuit, which originated in 2017, critics contend that the new system was subject to many of the same security vulnerabilities as the one it was replacing.

In an October 11, 2020 order, just weeks prior to the 2020 presidential election, U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg agreed with the concerns associated with the new Dominion voting system, writing that the case presented “serious system security vulnerability and operational issues that may place Plaintiffs and other voters at risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote that is accurately counted.”

In an October 11, 2020 order, just weeks prior to the 2020 presidential election, U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg agreed with the concerns associated with the new Dominion voting system, writing that the case presented “serious system security vulnerability and operational issues that may place Plaintiffs and other voters at risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote that is accurately counted.”

In that executive order President Trump declared a national emergency and the 2020 presidential election was conducted under this state of emergency.  The order states that people and organizations located, in part, outside the [[United States]] are known to be able to, {{quotebox|“interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of [[election]] and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of [[propaganda]] and [[disinformation]].”  The EO further states that this foreign interference in U.S. elections, “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the [[national security]] and [[foreign policy]] of the United States.”}}

In that executive order President Trump declared a national emergency and the 2020 presidential election was conducted under this state of emergency.  The order states that people and organizations located, in part, outside the [[United States]] are known to be able to, {{quotebox|“interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of [[election]] and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of [[propaganda]] and [[disinformation]].”  The EO further states that this foreign interference in U.S. elections, “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the [[national security]] and [[foreign policy]] of the United States.”}}

On August 26, 2020 Deputy Attorney General [[Jeff Rosen]] delivered remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.:

On August 26, 2020, Deputy Attorney General [[Jeff Rosen]] delivered remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.:

{{quotebox-float|As President Trump put it in Executive Order 13848: “In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and [[internet]]-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity...” ...While the tools of malign influence have proliferated, foreign governments such as Russia and China have also become more sophisticated and more bold.  ...As to boldness, as the [[Christopher Wray|FBI Director]] has recently pointed out, the [[PRC]] has been “engaged in a highly sophisticated malign foreign influence campaign,” using [[bribery]], [[blackmail]], and other malign tactics to influence our year-round policymaking, which certainly has implications for our elections.  [[Beijing]]’s corrupt methods are not always as blatant as its [[Chinagate|illegal campaign financing was in 1996]]; PRC tactics are more subtly pernicious and complex.  Beijing, for example, works relentlessly to co-opt seemingly independent middlemen who can influence members of Congress on a host of policies....  

{{quotebox-float|As President Trump put it in Executive Order 13848: “In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and [[internet]]-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity...” ...While the tools of malign influence have proliferated, foreign governments such as Russia and China have also become more sophisticated and more bold.  ...As to boldness, as the [[Christopher Wray|FBI Director]] has recently pointed out, the [[PRC]] has been “engaged in a highly sophisticated malign foreign influence campaign,” using [[bribery]], [[blackmail]], and other malign tactics to influence our year-round policymaking, which certainly has implications for our elections.  [[Beijing]]’s corrupt methods are not always as blatant as its [[Chinagate|illegal campaign financing was in 1996]]; PRC tactics are more subtly pernicious and complex.  Beijing, for example, works relentlessly to co-opt seemingly independent middlemen who can influence members of Congress on a host of policies....  

I want to touch briefly on the current threat landscape as we head toward Election Day. ...As the Office of the Director of National Intelligence ([[DNI|ODNI]]) recently made public on August 7 [2020], some foreign governments have preferences about our election — and have taken or planned malign activities in support of their preferences — including efforts by China and [[Iran]] to undermine President Trump and his Administration’s policies...<ref>https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/remarks-deputy-attorney-general-jeffrey-rosen-malign-foreign-influence-us-elections</ref>}}

I want to touch briefly on the current threat landscape as we head toward Election Day. ...As the Office of the Director of National Intelligence ([[DNI|ODNI]]) recently made public on August 7 [2020], some foreign governments have preferences about our election — and have taken or planned malign activities in support of their preferences — including efforts by China and [[Iran]] to undermine President Trump and his Administration’s policies...<ref>https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/remarks-deputy-attorney-general-jeffrey-rosen-malign-foreign-influence-us-elections</ref>}}

On December 8, 2020 Democrat member of the House Intelligence Committee [[Eric Swalwell]] was exposed as a Chinese asset.<ref>https://www.trevorloudon.com/2020/12/rep-swalwell-d-ca-and-the-chinese-spy-and-hes-still-on-intel-committee/</ref>  Swalwell had promoted the Chinese Communist Party line for years during the [[Russia collusion]] [[conspiracy theory]] and [[impeachment sham]] that [[Russia]], not China, was the biggest threat to American sovereignty, independence, and democracy.

On December 8, 2020, Democrat member of the House Intelligence Committee [[Eric Swalwell]] was exposed as a Chinese asset.<ref>https://www.trevorloudon.com/2020/12/rep-swalwell-d-ca-and-the-chinese-spy-and-hes-still-on-intel-committee/</ref>  Swalwell had promoted the Chinese Communist Party line for years during the [[Russia collusion]] [[conspiracy theory]] and [[impeachment sham]] that [[Russia]], not China, was the biggest threat to American sovereignty, independence, and democracy.

Between May 1, 2020 and October 31, 2020 the Chinese Communist Party paid $1,027,254.12 to the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', Bay Area Production Services, LLC (San Francisco), ''The Seattle Times'', ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', Walton Press, Inc. (Atlanta), FNP Printing & Publishing (Washington D.C.), Stellar Printing, Inc. (New York City), ''The Houston Chronicle'', ''[[The Boston Globe]]'', Hawaii Hochi Ltd. and Sun Sentinel Company (Miami) to print the ''China Daily'' newspaper in the United States.<ref>https://erbn.online/1009</ref>

Between May 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020, the Chinese Communist Party paid $1,027,254.12 to the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', Bay Area Production Services, LLC (San Francisco), ''The Seattle Times'', ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', Walton Press, Inc. (Atlanta), FNP Printing & Publishing (Washington D.C.), Stellar Printing, Inc. (New York City), ''The Houston Chronicle'', ''[[The Boston Globe]]'', Hawaii Hochi Ltd. and Sun Sentinel Company (Miami) to print the ''China Daily'' newspaper in the United States.<ref>https://erbn.online/1009</ref>

The Chinese communist party also paid $749,006.69 to ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'', the ''Los Angeles Times'', ''Foreign Policy'' and the  ''[[Financial Times]]'' for advertisement slots in their publications, including full articles written by ''China Daily''/the Chinese Communist Party.

The Chinese communist party also paid $749,006.69 to ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'', the ''Los Angeles Times'', ''Foreign Policy'' and the  ''[[Financial Times]]'' for advertisement slots in their publications, including full articles written by ''China Daily''/the Chinese Communist Party.

===Neustar===

===Neustar===

On September 29, 2020 the Biden campaign paid Neustar, the cyber firm that hacked the Trump White House, $18,819, [[FEC]] records show.<ref>https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202010219326734372</ref> Neustar is at the center of Special Counsel [[John Durham]]’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.  According to Durham, Neustar’s chief technology officer, Rodney Joffe, accessed sensitive web traffic data that the company maintained on behalf of the White House executive office in order to collect "derogatory" information about Donald Trump. Joffe allegedly provided the information to Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer [[Michael Sussmann]], who in turn gave it to the CIA during a meeting in February 2017.<ref>https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-had-firm-at-center-of-trump-hacking-scandal-on-campaign-payroll/</ref>

On September 29, 2020, the Biden campaign paid Neustar, the cyber firm that hacked the Trump White House, $18,819, [[FEC]] records show.<ref>https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202010219326734372</ref> Neustar is at the center of Special Counsel [[John Durham]]’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.  According to Durham, Neustar’s chief technology officer, Rodney Joffe, accessed sensitive web traffic data that the company maintained on behalf of the White House executive office in order to collect "derogatory" information about Donald Trump. Joffe allegedly provided the information to Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer [[Michael Sussmann]], who in turn gave it to the CIA during a meeting in February 2017.<ref>https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-had-firm-at-center-of-trump-hacking-scandal-on-campaign-payroll/</ref>

===Big Tech election interference===

===Big Tech election interference===

==Biden junta==

==Biden junta==

As of Novemeber 2020 [[Peter Neffenger]] was chairman of the [[corrupt]] [[voter fraud|ballot-stuffing]] and [[election fraud|election-rigging]] [[SmartMatic]] corporation.<ref>https://www.smartmatic.com/us/about/board-of-directors/detail/peter-neffenger/</ref>  Neffenger was appointed to the [[Biden junta]] organizational team.<ref>https://www.air.tv/watch?v=ir00pXx9QsKbvSdjsCy3nQ</ref>   

As of November 2020 [[Peter Neffenger]] was chairman of the [[corrupt]] [[voter fraud|ballot-stuffing]] and [[election fraud|election-rigging]] [[SmartMatic]] corporation.<ref>https://www.smartmatic.com/us/about/board-of-directors/detail/peter-neffenger/</ref>  Neffenger was appointed to the [[Biden junta]] organizational team.<ref>https://www.air.tv/watch?v=ir00pXx9QsKbvSdjsCy3nQ</ref>   

Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, with 35 years experience performing technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern analysis, and

Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, with 35 years experience performing technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern analysis, and

After the closing of polls in Pennsylvania and other swing states, the voting machines will be intercepted and then altered using complex [[algorithm]]s to alter the votes in a way that evades detection, handing a victory to the pre-designated “winner” (Joe Biden).  A covert app called “Scorecard” steals votes by making sure Democrats always stay about 3% ahead of their Republican rivals. “Scorecard steals the elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points,”  McInerney said.<ref>https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/11/red-alert-dems-collude-with-cia-to-launch-intelligence-operation-that-alters-voting-machine-results-in-pennsylvania-and-other-swing-states/</ref>

After the closing of polls in Pennsylvania and other swing states, the voting machines will be intercepted and then altered using complex [[algorithm]]s to alter the votes in a way that evades detection, handing a victory to the pre-designated “winner” (Joe Biden).  A covert app called “Scorecard” steals votes by making sure Democrats always stay about 3% ahead of their Republican rivals. “Scorecard steals the elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points,”  McInerney said.<ref>https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/11/red-alert-dems-collude-with-cia-to-launch-intelligence-operation-that-alters-voting-machine-results-in-pennsylvania-and-other-swing-states/</ref>

This explains why Joe Biden recently said, with great clarity, “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”  And why Biden told voters at a small rally that he didn’t “need their vote” to become President, and why Nancy Pelosi said Biden will win no matter what the votes say on November 3rd.  This was confirmed by the documents released by [[Edward Snowden]].<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-infiltrates-links-to-yahoo-google-data-centers-worldwide-snowden-documents-say/2013/10/30/e51d661e-4166-11e3-8b74-d89d714ca4dd_story.html</ref>   

This explains why Joe Biden recently said, with great clarity, “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”  And why Biden told voters at a small rally that he didn't “need their vote” to become president, and why Nancy Pelosi said Biden will win no matter what the votes say on November 3.  This was confirmed by the documents released by [[Edward Snowden]].<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-infiltrates-links-to-yahoo-google-data-centers-worldwide-snowden-documents-say/2013/10/30/e51d661e-4166-11e3-8b74-d89d714ca4dd_story.html</ref>   

On November 30, 2020 Gen. McInerney urged President Trump to invoke the [[Insurrection Act]].<ref>https://www.newstarget.com/2020-12-01-general-mcinerney-calls-for-president-trump-to-invoke-insurrection-act.html</ref>

On November 30, 2020, Gen. McInerney urged President Trump to invoke the [[Insurrection Act]].<ref>https://www.newstarget.com/2020-12-01-general-mcinerney-calls-for-president-trump-to-invoke-insurrection-act.html</ref>

On May 12, 2021, a group of more than 120 retired senior military officers wrote to Biden expressing doubts about his mental health, also pointing out in their letter that they agree with the abundant evidence showing vote fraud by the Democrats in the 2020 election.<ref>[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/american-heroes-120-retired-generals-admirals-write-joe-biden-questioning-mental-health-support-evidence-election-fraud/ AMERICAN HEROES: More Than 120 Retired Generals and Admirals Write Joe Biden Questioning His Mental Health — Support Evidence of Election Fraud] at the Gateway Pundit</ref>  The officers also chastized the FBI and the Supreme Court for ignoring all of the evidence of that fraud.

On May 12, 2021, a group of more than 120 retired senior military officers wrote to Biden expressing doubts about his mental health, also pointing out in their letter that they agree with the abundant evidence showing vote fraud by the Democrats in the 2020 election.<ref>[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/american-heroes-120-retired-generals-admirals-write-joe-biden-questioning-mental-health-support-evidence-election-fraud/ AMERICAN HEROES: More Than 120 Retired Generals and Admirals Write Joe Biden Questioning His Mental Health — Support Evidence of Election Fraud] at the Gateway Pundit</ref>  The officers also chastized the FBI and the Supreme Court for ignoring all of the evidence of that fraud.

{{reflist|2}}

{{reflist|2}}

==External link==

==External links==

*[https://archive.is/2Lhxn Biden Putsch], [[youtube]]

*[https://archive.is/2Lhxn Biden Putsch], [[youtube]]