| Line 306: |
Line 306: |
| | |Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and, to a certain extent, conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced [[multicultural]] elements are present as well. | | |Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and, to a certain extent, conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced [[multicultural]] elements are present as well. |
| | |$389.7 million | | |$389.7 million |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |''Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny''
| |
| − | |2023
| |
| − | |PG-13
| |
| − | |This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the series' face, putting down Indiana Jones himself in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, though the two subjects are very unrelated.
| |
| − | |$
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''JFK'' | | |''JFK'' |
| Line 323: |
Line 317: |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| | |This laughably inaccurate portrayal of the American healthcare system depicts private healthcare executives as heartless, and uses manipulative melodrama to promote socialized medicine. It also attacks the [[second amendment]]. | | |This laughably inaccurate portrayal of the American healthcare system depicts private healthcare executives as heartless, and uses manipulative melodrama to promote socialized medicine. It also attacks the [[second amendment]]. |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |''The Little Mermaid''
| |
| − | |2023
| |
| − | |PG
| |
| − | |This live-action remake of the classic 1989 animated film of the same name went full left-leaning unlike the original. Not only has Ariel been race-swapped for the diversity agenda, but King Triton has had several daughters of different races, implying that he had been sleeping around with other mermaids. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. The lyrics of "Poor Unfortunate Souls" and "Kiss the Girl" have been altered when the original songs have been accused of sexism and non-consent (the latter ignores that Ariel does want Eric to kiss her but is unable to because she couldn't speak). The final battle in the movie has Ariel finishing off Ursula herself instead of having Prince Eric do it, taking away that moment of chivalry and heroism. Also Grimsby attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]].
| |
| − | |$
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Lolita'' (1997 film) | | |''Lolita'' (1997 film) |
| Line 898: |
Line 886: |
| | |''Cuties'' | | |''Cuties'' |
| | |2020 | | |2020 |
| | + | | |
| | |This depraved French movie shamelessly sexualizes pre-pubescent girls and has them dancing and twerking in sexually suggestive ways that no respectable '''adult woman''' would be seen doing. When asked if they supported [[pedophilia]], producers at Netflix responded that they respected all religions, as if they really believed that pedophilia is actually a religion. | | |This depraved French movie shamelessly sexualizes pre-pubescent girls and has them dancing and twerking in sexually suggestive ways that no respectable '''adult woman''' would be seen doing. When asked if they supported [[pedophilia]], producers at Netflix responded that they respected all religions, as if they really believed that pedophilia is actually a religion. |
| | + | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Dallas Buyers Club'' | | |''Dallas Buyers Club'' |
| Line 933: |
Line 923: |
| | |1993 | | |1993 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This coming of age film circa 1976, attempts to normalize [[promiscuity]] and [[drug abuse]] among teenagers and young adults. | + | |This coming-of-age film circa 1976, attempts to normalize [[promiscuity]] and [[drug abuse]] among teenagers and young adults. |
| | |$7,993,039 | | |$7,993,039 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 957: |
Line 947: |
| | |2022 | | |2022 |
| | |NR | | |NR |
| − | |This movie directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonize patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expect. | + | |This movie directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonizes patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expect. |
| | |35$ Million | | |35$ Million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 969: |
Line 959: |
| | |2009 | | |2009 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Despite being made by known Republican<ref>http://whatculture.com/offbeat/10-celebs-you-wouldnt-expect-to-be-republicans?page=4</ref> Sam Raimi, the film's premise dealt with a woman being condemned simply for doing what her job required her to do at the bank, with Raimi also implicitly stating that the gypsy who cursed her had sympathetic reasons for cursing the main protagonist despite the fact that she herself had explicitly foresaked paying mortgage three times. In addition, the means to counteract the Lamia (the creature responsible for sending people to Hell when cursed) were more explicitly Pagan than Christian. | + | |Despite being made by known Republican<ref>http://whatculture.com/offbeat/10-celebs-you-wouldnt-expect-to-be-republicans?page=4</ref> Sam Raimi, the film's premise dealt with a woman being condemned simply for doing what her job required her to do at the bank, with Raimi also implicitly stating that the gypsy who cursed her had sympathetic reasons for cursing the main protagonist despite the fact that she herself had explicitly foresaken paying mortgage three times. In addition, the means to counteract the Lamia (the creature responsible for sending people to Hell when cursed) were more explicitly Pagan than Christian. |
| | |$90.8 million | | |$90.8 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,011: |
Line 1,001: |
| | |1988 | | |1988 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |The protagonists are criminals, thieves and liars. One character even tires to kill an elderly lady, as her being the only witness to the robbery. Also promotes infidelity, with the lawyer having an affair with one of the criminals, and ends up leaving his wife and daughter. | + | |The protagonists are criminals, thieves and liars. One character even tires to kill an elderly lady, as her being the only witness to the robbery. Also promotes infidelity, with the lawyer having an affair with one of the criminals and leaving his wife and daughter. |
| | |$62,493,712 | | |$62,493,712 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,035: |
Line 1,025: |
| | |2017 | | |2017 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This racist horror comedy-drama follows an African American man who discovers to his shock that his white American girlfriend's parents transplant the brains of white Americans into the bodies of African Americans as if to strip their victims of African American cultural identity. It presents a false dichotomy between black and white culture and discourages American ideals such as interracial and intercultural integration, all while accusing white Americans of wanting to eliminate instead of integrate all racial subcultures in the nation. | + | |This racist horror comedy-drama follows an African American man who discovers to his shock that his white American girlfriend's parents transplant the brains of white Americans into the bodies of African Americans as if to strip their victims of African American cultural identity. It presents a false dichotomy between black and white culture and discourages American ideals such as interracial and intercultural integration, all while accusing white Americans of wanting to eliminate instead of integrating all racial subcultures in the nation. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,059: |
Line 1,049: |
| | |1997 | | |1997 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]] created this coming of age film that is the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American revisionist textbook ''A People's History of the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America. Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, tells [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene, "You wanna read a ''real'' history book? Read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”<ref>https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/</ref> | + | |Left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]] created this coming-of-age film that is the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American revisionist textbook ''A People's History of the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America. Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, tells [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene, "You wanna read a ''real'' history book? Read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”<ref>https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/</ref> |
| | |$225,933,435 | | |$225,933,435 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,125: |
Line 1,115: |
| | |A homosexuality-themed comedy-drama film about a homosexual inmate who escapes to reunite with his lover. | | |A homosexuality-themed comedy-drama film about a homosexual inmate who escapes to reunite with his lover. |
| | |$2,037,459 | | |$2,037,459 |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny'' |
| | + | |2023 |
| | + | |PG-13 |
| | + | |This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the series' face, putting down Indiana Jones himself in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, though the two subjects are very unrelated. |
| | + | |$ |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''[[Jackass]]: The Movie'' | | |''[[Jackass]]: The Movie'' |
| Line 1,187: |
Line 1,183: |
| | |1994 | | |1994 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Disgusting film the features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt [[DEA]] responsible for her parents murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex). | + | |Disgusting film the features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt [[DEA]] responsible for her parents' murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex). |
| | |$19,501,238 | | |$19,501,238 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,205: |
Line 1,201: |
| | |2023 | | |2023 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case and point, with Disney changing Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more "modern times" as described as the "woke" social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments done by the side characters given to Ariel for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots, or evil with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers judging all of his daughters are of different races, at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with also videos showing the evidence of that, leading to assume that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and misleading the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie. | + | |Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case and point, with Disney changing Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more "modern times" as described as the "woke" social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments done by the side characters given to Ariel for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots, or evil with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers judging all of his daughters are of different races, at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. Also, Grimsby attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with also videos showing the evidence of that, leading to assume that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and misleading the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie. |
| | |$250 million | | |$250 million |
| | |- | | |- |