Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
368 bytes added ,  05:36, August 20, 2023
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick appointed as his trial adviser a former state court judge who had donated to an opponent of Ken Paxton in 2021. A day after the appointment, Marc Brown declined the assignment based on his $250 donation to an opponent of Paxt
Line 5: Line 5:  
The events surrounding this impeachment have occurred amid an alleged pattern of other purported political misuse of prosecutorial power, such as the indictment against [[Donald Trump]] (which took place on the same day that a key figure in the Paxton impeachment was arrested on Federal charges).  However, while the issues surrounding Trump involve one political party going after a member of the other party, in this case the allegations involve a split within the Republican party, that a group of [[RINO]]s are pushing to remove Paxton for being conservative.  
 
The events surrounding this impeachment have occurred amid an alleged pattern of other purported political misuse of prosecutorial power, such as the indictment against [[Donald Trump]] (which took place on the same day that a key figure in the Paxton impeachment was arrested on Federal charges).  However, while the issues surrounding Trump involve one political party going after a member of the other party, in this case the allegations involve a split within the Republican party, that a group of [[RINO]]s are pushing to remove Paxton for being conservative.  
    +
Lt. Gov. [[Dan Patrick]] appointed as his trial adviser a former state court judge who had donated to an opponent of [[Ken Paxton]] in 2021.  A day after the appointment, Marc Brown declined the assignment based on his $250 donation to an opponent of Paxton.<ref>https://www.texastribune.org/2023/08/19/dan-patrick-marc-brown-paxton-impeachment-adviser-counsel/</ref>
 
==Summary==
 
==Summary==
 
After a two-month investigation by the Texas House Committee on General Investigating into allegations of misuse of office, which led to 20 Articles of Impeachment against Paxton, the House voted 121-23 (all 23 members voting nay being Republicans; two members declared themselves Present Not Voting, with one excused absence and two Democrats choosing not to cast a vote or declare Present Not Voting) to impeach Paxton and send the matter to the Texas Senate for a trial; this action automatically caused Paxton to be suspended from office without pay or benefits pending the trial to permanently remove him from office and disqualify him from future state or local office.<ref>Paxton cannot, however, be prohibited from running for a Federal office if he were to consider such in the future.</ref>
 
After a two-month investigation by the Texas House Committee on General Investigating into allegations of misuse of office, which led to 20 Articles of Impeachment against Paxton, the House voted 121-23 (all 23 members voting nay being Republicans; two members declared themselves Present Not Voting, with one excused absence and two Democrats choosing not to cast a vote or declare Present Not Voting) to impeach Paxton and send the matter to the Texas Senate for a trial; this action automatically caused Paxton to be suspended from office without pay or benefits pending the trial to permanently remove him from office and disqualify him from future state or local office.<ref>Paxton cannot, however, be prohibited from running for a Federal office if he were to consider such in the future.</ref>
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,215

edits

Navigation menu