Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,464
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: − − == Narcissism and the Dark Triad personality traits == − − ''See also:'' [[Dark Triad personality traits]] − − The three [[Dark Triad personality traits]] are narcissism, [[Machiavellianism (Psychology)|Machiavellianism]] and [[psychopath]].<ref>[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36256568/ Rethinking aversive personality: Decomposing the Dark Triad traits into their common core and unique flavors], ''Journal of Personality''. 2022 Oct 18. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12785. Online ahead of print.</ref> Overall, the Dark Triad personality traits share certain features, such as emotional coldness, duplicity, and aggressiveness.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-triad Dark triad - psychology], Encylopedia Britannica</ref> The dark-triad personality traits are found to be more prominent in men than in women.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-triad Dark triad - psychology], Encylopedia Britannica</ref> − − "The “Dark Triad” [[personality]] traits are a toxic amalgamation of various negative traits and behaviors, such as they are domineering, violent, volatile, manipulative, remorseless, cynical, [[deceit]]ful, etc."<ref>[https://archive.md/ElEdd#selection-245.0-245.56 How to Identify And Deal With a “Dark Triad” Personality]</ref> − [[File:The Dark Triad Traits.jpg|thumbnail|825px|center|The dark triad personality traits and their various sub-traits.]] − {{Clear}}
→Narcissism and the Dark Triad personality traits
So saying a prejudicial ''study'' or ''examination'' of an unknown object's or person's traits or characteristics instead results in the recognition of ''misperceptions'' by the author of the journal article, but actually saying so about a person's examination of facts personalizes the act of ''misperceiving'' to the point that it opens to the audited author of the thesis to charges of hypocrisy, because the manner of the author's own understanding of the alleged prejudices challenging the authenticity of the study or examination is not conveyed.
So saying a prejudicial ''study'' or ''examination'' of an unknown object's or person's traits or characteristics instead results in the recognition of ''misperceptions'' by the author of the journal article, but actually saying so about a person's examination of facts personalizes the act of ''misperceiving'' to the point that it opens to the audited author of the thesis to charges of hypocrisy, because the manner of the author's own understanding of the alleged prejudices challenging the authenticity of the study or examination is not conveyed.
==See also==
==See also==