1,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
Talk:Creation and evolution compared (view source)
Revision as of 13:53, June 14, 2007
, 13:53, June 14, 2007→Science can be wrong
That's the whole point of science. They're willing to rework their theories when presented with hard evidence. If you've been to the Museum of National History in Washington, D.C., there are many notices on the dinosaur/caveman displays, saying some of the information is now outdated, thanks to new discoveries. If science can be wrong, can creation science? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 09:47, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
That's the whole point of science. They're willing to rework their theories when presented with hard evidence. If you've been to the Museum of National History in Washington, D.C., there are many notices on the dinosaur/caveman displays, saying some of the information is now outdated, thanks to new discoveries. If science can be wrong, can creation science? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 09:47, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
Creation science '''''is''''' science. You seem to be making a distiction. Yes it can be wrong, but only where it tries to speculate beyond what the bible specificly says.--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 09:53, 14 June 2007 (EDT)