Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,389
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − + + +
Talk:World Economic Forum (view source)
Revision as of 22:25, September 7, 2023
, 22:25, September 7, 2023no edit summary
* Also, the citations are to the events/facts rather than to their cluelessness.
* Also, the citations are to the events/facts rather than to their cluelessness.
* Are there any cites to their cluelessness?
* Are there any cites to their cluelessness?
* Finally there and a couple of other places, it would be better imho to use non-blaming words. Even though obviously we will show our view of things, we want others to follow along, concluding on their own the blame, right ? {{unsigned|}}
* Finally there and a couple of other places, it would be better imho to use non-blaming words. Even though obviously we will show our view of things, we want others to follow along, concluding on their own the blame, right ? {{unsigned|America2023}}
::Good points. Have at it. Be Bold, as they say. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 14:20, September 7, 2023 (EDT)
::Good points. Have at it. Be Bold, as they say. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 14:20, September 7, 2023 (EDT)
:::By all means, please do improve this page! The points you mention sound good to me. Probably there won't be a reputable reference we can use where the WEF is called "clueless," but we can make the case without directly saying it. Just line up some examples. As for your last point, I also agree. We can handle topics in a professional matter without stooping to name-calling. Sometimes we just need to call it like it is, but keeping it professional is always my preference. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:25, September 7, 2023 (EDT)