Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,404
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − +
no edit summary
Thucydides is perhaps most well known to modern scholars for his view of politics and the nature of interstate relations. He repeatedly argued, during the course of his narrative, that states should act primarily in their own self-interest. More importantly, while not ignoring more immediate provocations, he contended that the long term Origins of the Peloponnesian War lay in the growing discrepancy in power between Athens and its main rival, Sparta. These views have led many historians and political scientists to regard him as the father of realist political theory.
Thucydides is perhaps most well known to modern scholars for his view of politics and the nature of interstate relations. He repeatedly argued, during the course of his narrative, that states should act primarily in their own self-interest. More importantly, while not ignoring more immediate provocations, he contended that the long term Origins of the Peloponnesian War lay in the growing discrepancy in power between Athens and its main rival, Sparta. These views have led many historians and political scientists to regard him as the father of [[realist]] political theory.
Thucydides' view of internal politics was ambiguous. While he frequently praised the merits of democracy, and the endurance of democratic societies during times of great difficulty, he also regarded it as a potentially dangerous system, in which uninformed masses could be manipulated by self-serving demagogues into pursuing foolish courses of action, such as the poorly planned and executed Athenian invasion of Sicily in 415. A strong, statesman-like leader like his hero, Pericles, would thus be needed to restrain the urges of the people.
Thucydides' view of internal politics was ambiguous. While he frequently praised the merits of democracy, and the endurance of democratic societies during times of great difficulty, he also regarded it as a potentially dangerous system, in which uninformed masses could be manipulated by self-serving demagogues into pursuing foolish courses of action, such as the poorly planned and executed Athenian invasion of Sicily in 415. A strong, statesman-like leader like his hero, Pericles, would thus be needed to restrain the urges of the people.
[[Category:Ancient Greek Historians]]
[[Category:Ancient Greek Historians]]