22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
an excellent suggestion - who can help do this?
:: I'm not too interested in the my view vs. your view arguement, because I'm not a YEC and believe in an old earth. But that isn't my point. I just think, unless there is a desire on CP to expand on these articles further, that it would be better served to be included in one article, with the same disclaimer. However, to get this kind of thing done, we need to get Sysop confirmation, as per the new editing guidelines. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 16:06, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
:: I'm not too interested in the my view vs. your view arguement, because I'm not a YEC and believe in an old earth. But that isn't my point. I just think, unless there is a desire on CP to expand on these articles further, that it would be better served to be included in one article, with the same disclaimer. However, to get this kind of thing done, we need to get Sysop confirmation, as per the new editing guidelines. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 16:06, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
:That's OK Colest, there's a middle ground here! I actually think your idea is good, but I'm unable to do it - I don't know how, and it seems as if I can't access those pages anyway as you say. You're right that multiple pages with the same info is a waste, so if you or someone else knows how to make sure that i) a logical flow of proper information is made available, and ii) YEC viewpoints are not just visible, but the primary explanation, I'm totally fine with that. [[User:Carefulnature|Carefulnature]] 16:11, 14 June 2007 (EDT)